Login | Register

Post Reply 
Interesting out there THEORY: Nuclear Weapons Don't exist
04-15-2015, 11:23 AM
Post: #1
Interesting out there THEORY: Nuclear Weapons Don't exist
This seems to be another one of those "out there" conspiracies that is gaining momentum as of late.

I'm not saying I believe it, but it's interesting:

Quote:1. Hiroshima and Nagasaki were not destroyed by atomic bombs 1945. The Japanese towns with their poor inhabitants in their simple wood/paper shanty houses were destroyed and burnt down by US napalm carpet bombings. The rich Japanese lived in the suburbs!

2. That two atomic bombs exploded in Japan 1945 were just US wartime propaganda (false information) to impress the Soviet union. Stalin wasn't fooled. He (or his deputy Beria) invented/faked his own atomic bomb 1949.

3. The almost 70 years old hoax from 6 August 1945 is of course still working kept going strong by several governments, crazy generals and plenty physicists incl. Nobel prize winners that cannot get any better jobs than lying for their governments - the only real job many physicists can get apart from being low paid school teachers - and by mainstream media that are experts in publishing false info to brainwash you.

4. The USA use billions of dollars to maintain the hoax. Russia doesn't spend a rubel or kopek to keep the show going.

5. France faked its atomic bomb in the 1960's.

Those who know, know! Big Grin
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
04-15-2015, 11:26 AM
Post: #2
RE: Interesting THEORY: Nuclear Weapons Don't exist
Quote:Major Alexander P. de Seversky, who 1945 inspected the bombed towns of Japan, testified:

In Hiroshima I was prepared for radically different sights. But, to my surprise, Hiroshima looked exactly like all the other burned-out cities in Japan.
There was a familiar pink blot, about two miles in diameter. It was dotted with charred trees and telephone poles. Only one of the cities twenty bridges was down. Hiroshima's clusters of modern buildings in the downtown section stood upright.

It was obvious that the blast could not have been so powerful as we had been led to believe. It was extensive blast rather than intensive.

I had heard of buildings instantly consumed by unprecedented heat. Yet here I saw the buildings structurally intact, and what is more, topped by undamaged flag poles, lightning rods, painted railings, air raid precaution signs and other comparatively fragile objects.

At the T-bridge, the aiming point for the atomic bomb, I looked for the "bald spot" where everything presumably had been vaporized in the twinkling of an eye. It wasn't there or anywhere else. I could find no traces of unusual phenomena.

What I did see was in substance a replica of Yokohama or Osaka, or the Tokyo suburbs - the familiar residue of an area of wood and brick houses razed by uncontrollable fire. Everywhere I saw the trunks of charred and leafless trees, burned and unburned chunks of wood. The fire had been intense enough to bend and twist steel girders and to melt glass until it ran like lava - just as in other Japanese cities.

The concrete buildings nearest to the center of explosion, some only a few blocks from the heart of the atom blast, showed no structural damage. Even cornices, canopies and delicate exterior decorations were intact. Window glass was shattered, of course, but single-panel frames held firm; only window frames of two or more panels were bent and buckled. The blast impact therefore could not have been unusual.

Then I questioned a great many people who were inside such buildings when the bomb exploded. Their descriptions matched the scores of accounts I had heard from people caught in concrete buildings in areas hit by blockbusters. Hiroshima's ten-story press building, about three blocks from the center of the explosion, was badly gutted by the fire following the explosion, but otherwise unhurt. The people caught in the building did not suffer any unusual effects.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
04-15-2015, 11:30 AM
Post: #3
RE: Interesting THEORY: Nuclear Weapons Don't exist
seems like this is a popular theory now:



Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
04-15-2015, 11:48 AM
Post: #4
RE: Interesting THEORY: Nuclear Weapons Don't exist




Galen Winsor is a nuclear physicist of renown who worked at, and helped design, nuclear power plants in Hanford, WA; Oak Ridge, TN; Morris, IL, San Jose, CA; Wimington, NJ. Among his positions of expertise he was in charge of measuring and controlling the nuclear fuel inventory and storage.

Galen Winsor has traveled and lectured all over America, spoken on national talk radio, and made several videos exposing the misunderstood issues of nuclear radiation. He shows that fear of radiation has been exaggerated to scare people ... so a few powerful people can maintain total control of the world's most valuable power resource. Filmed by Ben Williams in 1986.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
04-15-2015, 11:51 AM
Post: #5
RE: Interesting THEORY: Nuclear Weapons Don't exist
I have wondered about this myself, if they dont have this, what the hell did they drop on japan?
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
04-15-2015, 11:54 AM
Post: #6
RE: Interesting THEORY: Nuclear Weapons Don't exist
the nuclear threat is one of the best ways to keep people in fear mode.

without fear, people are harder to control.

I don't know too much about this subject just throwing this out there.

Seems ludicrous, but my mind is open.

Apparently galen windsor ate plutonium with no problem.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
04-15-2015, 12:01 PM
Post: #7
RE: Interesting THEORY: Nuclear Weapons Don't exist
http://time.com/3494421/hiroshima-and-na...the-ruins/

[Image: hiroshima-nagasaki-16.jpg?quality=65&...;amp;w=520]
[Image: hiroshima-nagasaki-15.jpg?quality=65&...;amp;w=357]
[Image: hiroshima-nagasaki-14.jpg?quality=65&...;amp;w=553]
[Image: hiroshima-nagasaki-13.jpg?quality=65&...;amp;w=553]
[Image: hiroshima-nagasaki-12.jpg?quality=65&...;amp;w=453]
[Image: hiroshima-nagasaki-11.jpg?quality=65&...;amp;w=816]
[Image: hiroshima-nagasaki-09.jpg?quality=65&...;amp;w=553]
[Image: hiroshima-nagasaki-08.jpg?quality=65&...;amp;w=553]

photos from time magazine website, truth be told, you cant really say what those pics show.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
04-15-2015, 12:09 PM
Post: #8
RE: Interesting THEORY: Nuclear Weapons Don't exist
i mean if a lot of people think the moon landing is BS, this isn't that far out.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
04-15-2015, 12:12 PM
Post: #9
RE: Interesting THEORY: Nuclear Weapons Don't exist
http://www.allworldwars.com/Photographs-...asaki.html

i dunno theres a lot of photo evidence on this.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
04-15-2015, 12:14 PM
Post: #10
RE: Interesting THEORY: Nuclear Weapons Don't exist
the Catholic Church was ground zero for the bomb in Nagasaki.

Nagasaki was the Christian capital of Asia.

I think this issue deserves further investigation.

These people are saying nuclear power is real, just not nuclear bombs.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
04-15-2015, 12:20 PM
Post: #11
RE: Interesting THEORY: Nuclear Weapons Don't exist
The media was so easy to control during WWII, they could have gotten away with anything. All the footage we've ever seen of atomic bombs is shot on grainy, low-quality film. The Bikini Atoll one in particular is used over and over because it's film quality is the highest. Could it been faked using the special effects of the day?

[Image: bikini_bomb.jpg]

I don't know, but if you're willing to consider they'd hire a filmmaker to fake the moon landing, you probably should consider this one, too.

“Reality denied comes back to haunt.”
― Philip K. Dick, Flow My Tears, the Policeman Said
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
04-15-2015, 12:21 PM
Post: #12
RE: Interesting THEORY: Nuclear Weapons Don't exist
how would you replicate this using the special effects of the day.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
04-15-2015, 12:24 PM
Post: #13
RE: Interesting THEORY: Nuclear Weapons Don't exist


Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
04-15-2015, 12:26 PM
Post: #14
RE: Interesting THEORY: Nuclear Weapons Don't exist
The concept of nukes were the entire backbone of the 'red scare' cold war

I have never heard this before, fascinating

Masato Toys Forum: http://www.MasatoToysForums.com
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
04-15-2015, 12:27 PM
Post: #15
RE: Interesting THEORY: Nuclear Weapons Don't exist
Pyrotechnics. There is a general theory that a large TNT blast accompanied with a white phosphorous explosion could make the iconic mushroom cloud, just not with the legendary power of the atomic bomb. It was just a pretty explosion, pre-rigged like a fireworks show.

I don't know if I believe it. But I don't know if I disbelieve it, either. I certainly wouldn't put it past our government.

“Reality denied comes back to haunt.”
― Philip K. Dick, Flow My Tears, the Policeman Said
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread: Author Replies: Views: Last Post
  Interesting Videos Dick Tater 48 1,610 06-13-2020 11:33 AM
Last Post: pug-thug
  The Black Goo Theory The Anti-Archon 76 34,665 05-28-2020 02:05 AM
Last Post: Billygoat
  Trump is the AntiChrist - Theory Redneck 13 340 05-14-2020 01:29 PM
Last Post: pug-thug
  US Doctor: How can you make a vaccine for something never proven to exist? pug-thug 18 500 04-13-2020 06:52 AM
Last Post: pug-thug

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)