Login | Register

Post Reply 
Dr. Tom Cowan explores the COVID virus invented out of sheer nonsense
10-22-2020, 11:22 PM
Post: #1
Dr. Tom Cowan explores the COVID virus invented out of sheer nonsense
Dr. Tom Cowan explores the COVID virus invented out of sheer nonsense Oct
19
by Jon Rappoport
—Cowan analyzes yet another key document posted by the CDC, in their journal, Emerging Infectious Diseases: “Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 from Patient with Coronavirus Disease, United States”—

by Jon Rappoport

October 19, 2020

(To join our email list, click here.)

The hits keep coming. The CDC used an arbitrary computer “tinker-toy” process to invent a description of the virus. The virus that no one has proven exists. This is the basic conclusion of Dr. Tom Cowan.

The CDC article was discovered by Sally Fallon Morrell. Her co-author, Dr. Cowan, fleshes out the fraud. Cowan’s article is titled, “Only Poisoned Monkey Cells ‘Grew’ the ‘Virus’.”

Dr. Cowan: “[The CDC journal article] was published in June 2020 [original publication, March 2020]. The purpose of the article was for a group of about 20 virologists to describe the state of the science of the isolation, purification and biological characteristics of the new SARS-CoV-2 virus, and to share this information with other scientists for their own research. A thorough and careful reading of this important paper reveals some shocking findings.”

“First, in the section titled ‘Whole Genome Sequencing,’ we find that rather than having isolated the virus and sequencing the genome from end to end, they found 37 base pairs from unpurified samples using PCR probes. This means they actually looked at 37 out of the approximately 30,000 of the base pairs that are claimed to be the genome of the intact virus. They then took these 37 segments and put them into a computer program, which filled in the rest of the base pairs.”

In other words, the sequencing of the SARS-CoV-2 virus was done by assumption and arbitrary inference. If this is science, a penguin is a spaceship.

Cowan: “To me, this computer-generation step constitutes scientific fraud. Here is an equivalency: A group of researchers claim to have found a unicorn because they found a piece of a hoof, a hair from a tail, and a snippet of a horn. They then add that information into a computer and program it to re-create the unicorn, and they then claim this computer re-creation is the real unicorn. Of course, they had never actually seen a unicorn so could not possibly have examined its genetic makeup to compare their samples with the actual unicorn’s hair, hooves and horn.”

“The researchers claim they decided which is the real genome of SARS-CoV-2 by ‘consensus,’ sort of like a vote. Again, different computer programs will come up with different versions of the imaginary ‘unicorn,’ so they come together as a group and decide which is the real imaginary unicorn.”

As I’ve been stating, the “discovery” of the “new virus” was actually the foisting of a PRE-DETERMINED STORY ABOUT A VIRUS. Nothing real or believable about it.

But once the official pattern is laid down, others follow it dutifully.

Dr. Cowan uncovers more insanity in the CDC journal article. Using the ASSUMED new virus, in an UN-ISOLATED STATE, the researchers try to prove it is harmful by injecting it on to several different types of cells in the lab:

Cowan: “The real blockbuster finding in this study comes later, a finding so shocking that I had to read it many times before I could believe what I was reading. Let me quote the passage intact:”

“’Therefore, we examined the capacity of SARS-CoV-2 to infect and replicate in several common primate and human cell lines, including human adenocarcinoma cells (A549), human liver cells (HUH 7.0), and human embryonic kidney cells (HEK-293T). In addition to Vero E6 and Vero CCL81 cells [monkey cells]. … Each cell line was inoculated at high multiplicity of infection and examined 24h post-infection. No CPE was observed in any of the cell lines except in Vero [monkey] cells, which grew to greater than 10 to the 7th power at 24 h post-infection. In contrast, HUH 7.0 and 293T showed only modest viral replication, and A549 cells [human cells] were incompatible with SARS CoV-2 infection’.”

“What does this language actually mean, and why is it the most shocking statement of all from the virology community? When virologists attempt to prove infection, they have three possible ‘hosts’ or models on which they can test…”

“The third method virologists use to prove infection and pathogenicity — the method they most rely on — is inoculation of solutions they say contain the virus onto a variety of tissue cultures. As I have pointed out many times, such inoculation has never been shown to kill (lyse) the tissue, unless the tissue is first starved and poisoned.”

“The shocking thing about the above [CDC journal] quote is that using their own methods, the virologists found that solutions containing SARS-CoV-2 — even in high amounts — were NOT, I repeat NOT, infective to any of the three human tissue cultures they tested. In plain English, this means they proved, on their terms, that this ‘new coronavirus’ is not infectious to human beings. It is ONLY infective to monkey kidney cells, and only then when you add two potent drugs (gentamicin and amphotericin), known to be toxic to kidneys, to the mix.”

“My friends, read this again and again. These virologists, published by the CDC, performed a clear proof, on their terms, showing that the SARS-CoV- 2 virus is harmless to human beings. That is the only possible conclusion, but, unfortunately, this result is not even mentioned in their conclusion. They simply say they can provide virus stocks cultured only on monkey Vero cells, thanks for coming.”

So first…use a process of genetic sequencing that involves concocting, out of an arbitrary computer program…

The existence and structure of the “new virus”…

And then, taking a soup that the researchers claim contains the virus, in an un-isolated state, inject the soup into several types of cells in the lab…

And discover the prime target—human cells—are not infected by the imaginary virus.

And after this good day’s work, walk away and pretend nothing odd or self-incriminating happened.

And oh yes, lock down the planet based on this “science.”

Naturally, we MUST take a toxic vaccine that prevents non-infection by the non-virus.

Those who know, know! Big Grin
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
10-23-2020, 12:20 AM
Post: #2
RE: Dr. Tom Cowan explores the COVID virus invented out of sheer nonsense
my very early prediction, that we were dealing with SARS from 2003 and not a new novel virus, is panning out

more and more researchers are saying COVID-19 = SARS

there are forums you can read where legit scientists discuss what the fuck this thing is.

I love patting myself on the back, but my prediction rate has been INSANE

Quote:10th Jun, 2020
Pieter Borger
W & W Research
In 2003, Nature reported that SARS-CoV had two highly specific genetic fingerprints. First, unlike the other coronaviruses, the SARS-CoV strain of 2003 did not contain the HE protein. The HE gene is also absent from SARS-CoV2. Further, a short lysine-rich region (KTFPPTEPKKDKKKK) in the N-protein was reported to be unique to SARS-CoV. Intriguingly, the exact same sequence (KTFPPTEPKKDKKKK) is found in the N-protein of SARS-CoV2.
Both characteristics prove that the SARS of 2003 never really was eridicated but probably hid somewhere in animals (bats?). So, my thesis is that we are dealing with a weakened and slightly recombined strain of SARS of 2003.
To my astonishment, and in favor of my claim, the german Virology Institute (Robert Koch Institute, Berlin) made a aspecific RT-PCR test kit for COVID testing, but it detects SARS-CoV of 2003. So, in my humble opinion: SARS = COVID.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
10-23-2020, 12:21 AM
Post: #3
RE: Dr. Tom Cowan explores the COVID virus invented out of sheer nonsense
my very early take was that we were dealing with a small CORE GROUP OF REAL SARS cases, with a MAJORITY of cases being relabeld common cold/covid/respiratory

there is no covid-19

IT DOES NOT EXIST
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
10-23-2020, 12:31 AM
Post: #4
RE: Dr. Tom Cowan explores the COVID virus invented out of sheer nonsense
Quote:Abstract
It was common knowledge that some strain of coronavirus-sooner or later-was going to cause a pandemic. It was known since the SARS-CoV-outbreak in 2003. In 2013 and 2015, the world was informed that a variant of SARS-CoV in bats was emerging as a threat for humans. Why was no action taken by our governments and the World Health Organization (WHO)? The Corona crisis was not only conceivable and foreseeable, but the world could have been prepared. We could have had medication and we could have had a vaccine long ago. That is, when there had been visionary medical-political global leadership." Unlike the other coronaviruses, both the SARS-CoV strain of 2003 and SARS-CoV2 (COVID19-virus) do not contain the HE protein [9,10]. Further, a short lysine-rich region (KTFPPTEPKKDKKKKTDEAQ) in the N-protein was reported to be unique to SARS-CoV [10]. Intriguingly, an almost identical sequence (KTFPPTEPKKDKKKKADETQ) is found in the N-protein of SARS-CoV2 [11]. Both characteristics prove that we are dealing with a variant of the same virus of 2003."

https://www.researchgate.net/publication...e_Prepared

how many times do I have to be right? Check what I wrote several months ago

My back is bleeding from the self scratching
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
10-23-2020, 12:34 AM
Post: #5
RE: Dr. Tom Cowan explores the COVID virus invented out of sheer nonsense
COvid-19 is a SLIGHT SLIGHT variant of 2003

the same type of variation you would see in the common cold from season to season or the flu.

This is NOT A NOVEL VIRUS

FULL STOP
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
10-23-2020, 04:34 AM
Post: #6
RE: Dr. Tom Cowan explores the COVID virus invented out of sheer nonsense
It is right there in the name, though? SARS-CoV2.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
10-23-2020, 04:37 AM
Post: #7
RE: Dr. Tom Cowan explores the COVID virus invented out of sheer nonsense
"On 11 February 2020, the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses adopted the official name "severe acute respiratory
syndrome coronavirus 2" (SARS-CoV-2)"

Not sure this counts as a prediction, if it came after 02/11/2020
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
10-23-2020, 04:44 AM
Post: #8
RE: Dr. Tom Cowan explores the COVID virus invented out of sheer nonsense
(10-23-2020 12:31 AM)EVILYOSHIDA Wrote:  
Quote:Abstract
It was common knowledge that some strain of coronavirus-sooner or later-was going to cause a pandemic. It was known since the SARS-CoV-outbreak in 2003. In 2013 and 2015, the world was informed that a variant of SARS-CoV in bats was emerging as a threat for humans. Why was no action taken by our governments and the World Health Organization (WHO)? The Corona crisis was not only conceivable and foreseeable, but the world could have been prepared. We could have had medication and we could have had a vaccine long ago. That is, when there had been visionary medical-political global leadership." Unlike the other coronaviruses, both the SARS-CoV strain of 2003 and SARS-CoV2 (COVID19-virus) do not contain the HE protein [9,10]. Further, a short lysine-rich region (KTFPPTEPKKDKKKKTDEAQ) in the N-protein was reported to be unique to SARS-CoV [10]. Intriguingly, an almost identical sequence (KTFPPTEPKKDKKKKADETQ) is found in the N-protein of SARS-CoV2 [11]. Both characteristics prove that we are dealing with a variant of the same virus of 2003."

https://www.researchgate.net/publication...e_Prepared

how many times do I have to be right? Check what I wrote several months ago

My back is bleeding from the self scratching

[Image: nD7exyx.gif?noredirect]
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
10-23-2020, 09:14 AM
Post: #9
RE: Dr. Tom Cowan explores the COVID virus invented out of sheer nonsense
(10-23-2020 04:37 AM)Chaos Reigns Wrote:  "On 11 February 2020, the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses adopted the official name "severe acute respiratory
syndrome coronavirus 2" (SARS-CoV-2)"

Not sure this counts as a prediction, if it came after 02/11/2020

They called it a brand new NOVEL coronavirus

I said back then it was not NOVEL and simply was just SARS

yes they did call covid-19 SARS COV2, but at the same time in classic NWO fashion , called it BRAND NEW

Those who know, know! Big Grin
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread: Author Replies: Views: Last Post
  Tom Cruise going to space in 2021 to film movie with help of SpaceX KurtDangle 3 291 01-09-2021 06:02 PM
Last Post: CTsar
  the Pizza Effect and invented traditions EVILYOSHIDA 6 1,466 01-02-2021 10:35 PM
Last Post: EVILYOSHIDA
  the number 33 is popping in tons of places when discussing crown virus EVILYOSHIDA 77 6,751 12-24-2020 07:27 AM
Last Post: Señor Penis
  Tom Cruise does not sound happy. Loses it on the Set. EVILYOSHIDA 16 457 12-19-2020 02:26 PM
Last Post: DonJohnson

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)