Login | Register

Post Reply 
Prof. Svetlana Voreskova: Why Feminism Is Poison
06-04-2019, 02:09 AM
Post: #1
Prof. Svetlana Voreskova: Why Feminism Is Poison
Prof. Svetlana Voreskova: Why Feminism Is Poison

January 28, 2018 Professor Svetlana Voreskova Current Affairs, Editor's Choice Link, Investigation, Lifestyle, Psychology

Feminism is built upon the principle of patriarchy theory – the idea that women have been oppressed by men throughout our history and that men have always been “privileged” relative to women. Almost all other feminist doctrine is built upon this foundation. Patriarchy theory itself, is not only a giant historical lie, but it is a lie that has been deliberately concocted and perpetuated by feminists to encourage women to see men as the enemy.

The demonisation of men is vitally important to feminism and it is a constant theme that underscores all feminist discourse and literature. Feminism could not survive without it because most modern feminist activism is based on advocating for special status for women, using the justification that women have traditionally been oppressed and that men are basically brutish oppressors by default.

I have debunked patriarchy theory on many occasions in debating with feminists. It’s not difficult to do. I asked one British feminist who claimed women in the early 1900’s in Britain were oppressed, if she really though those women would have preferred to work in the mines or fight in the trenches. Her response – Silence.

I asked her if she realised that whilst women did not have the vote in the UK of the 1900’s nor did many men, and furthermore that women did not have the vote because they avoided all of the responsibilities that went hand in hand with the vote..

Her response – Silence. I asked her if she realised that the franchise in the UK in the 1900’s was linked to both property rights and citizenship responsibilities such as conscription. Her response – Silence. I asked her if she realised that most working class women in the UK opposed the suffragettes because they realised that equality with men would have been deeply hurtful to them.

Her response – Silence. I asked her if she really thought that Emiline Pankhurst would ever have tolerated equality. Her response – Silence.

I pointed out that while women were always discriminated against throughout history, men were also discriminated against, but often in much harsher ways. – Silence.

She did pop up on another thread though babbling away about how women in the UK were oppressed in the 1900’s. No surprise there.

In order to believe in feminist theory, it is a requirement to ignore historical and scientific fact. This leaves feminists with a conundrum. They cannot argue their case against anybody who is not prepared to just fall for shallow slogans so it’s better not to engage in debate at all. I admire Germaine Greer in particular for her debating skills.

She will refuse to engage with anyone who doesn’t agree with her. She uses typical feminist shaming tactics but in her own unique way. Her insults, designed to deflect an awkward question, are delivered as gentle humour.

They are designed to win over the audience and shame the questioner and they almost always work. Most feminists however don’t have her polished skills so they just chant slogans and parrot off the same debunked rhetoric over and over again. I suspect the almost religious fervor of their repetitiveness is as much designed to convince themselves as anyone else.

Western feminists main catch-call these days is equality. Feminists just want equality for women they say. I have asked feminists from The UK, USA, Australia, Germany and various other countries to give me examples of laws or regulations in their respective countries that discriminate against women in any way.

I further pointed out that it is illegal under EU law to discriminate against women on the basis of gender. It is however, thanks to feminism, perfectly legal in some cases to discriminate against men. Both employment law and family law often reflect this.

The response of feminists – Silence. Just to check my facts I phoned several woman’s advocacy organisations in Ireland and the UK, asking if they could give me examples of where women were unequal under the law. The British National Council of Women claim they advocate for equality for women in Britain. Their representatives were unable to furnish me with even one example of where women in the UK were discriminated against. They became quite agitated when I persisted in asking them. It’s almost hilarious. You couldn’t make it up.

In fact women in the UK are the beneficiaries of all kinds of affirmative action programs, special lobby groups and government funded grant schemes. Women in the UK are also given priority over men in terms of social and emergency housing and social welfare supplements. There is a reason why over 88% of homeless people are men and that reason is partly created by feminism.

Families in the UK are also suffering through spiralling divorce rates and the increasing reluctance of men to get involved in long-term relationships at all. Men have less chance of surviving a marriage now than a game of Russian roulette. Almost 59% of marriages will end in divorce. 70% of divorces are initiated by women and in over 80% of divorces, the man will lose his home, his kids and a percentage of his future earnings.

It’s no wonder men don’t want to get married. Those are odds that the most compulsive gambler would run away from. The problem is that women do want marriage. Women need stable long-term relationships even more than men do for obvious reasons, but they are finding it increasingly difficult to find them.

Meanwhile feminism has been teaching girls and women that they deserve to have it all. That if they are not blissfully happy then they should bail out; that they should never have to compromise in any way to attract or keep a man; that it is men who should make all the compromises. When a man makes the decision to opt out of this one-sided deal, it is, we are told, because he is selfish or immature; he cannot “man up”. He is a “manchild”. Many men are simply walking away.

Many are avoiding the toxic, over-entitled, parasitical products of decades of feminism altogether and looking for suitable matches overseas. Women are left wondering “where have all the good men gone?” Well the answer dear, is that they have run away from you because you see, a man wants a partner. He wants a lover, companion, friend and comrade and he wants that partner to be female. He doesn’t want some gender-neutral humanoid, and he certainly doesn’t want some whiny, judgmental entitlement princess who will take him to the cleaners at the first sign of trouble.

READ THE REST: https://www.ikonlondonmagazine.com/how-f...n-society/

Those who know, know! Big Grin
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
06-04-2019, 02:11 AM
Post: #2
RE: Prof. Svetlana Voreskova: Why Feminism Is Poison
Quote:about the author:

My name is Svetlana Voreskova. I am from Rostov on Don in the Russian Federation. I Live now in Dublin Ireland. I work as a teacher of history and languages in a college near Dublin.

I used to think that feminists were just pathetic, insecure attention seekers who would stage petulant public hissy-fits when anyone said anything they did not approve of. After a horrible incident involving someone close to me however, I experienced the true depth of the vitriolic hatred that is at the heart of the feminist movement.

Since then I have been studying feminist literature and investigating various feminist groups mostly in Ireland and the UK. I have attended feminist seminars and events and have even reduced myself to engaging in some of their infantile public protests. I certainly know more about feminist theory and doctrine than most feminists do as is confirmed whenever I find myself debating one of them.

I live in a country where I enjoy equal rights and equal opportunities under the law. I am a strong, independent and educated woman. I don’t need whining feminists claiming they speak for me. If someone commits a crime against me then I will go to the police. If someone says something that offends me then I will either respond, or I will behave like an adult and get over it.

I am tired of members of the most privileged, pampered, cosseted demographic in the history of human civilisation constantly whining about how oppressed they are, and it annoys me when these people claim to speak for all women. They do not.

Far from being strong, empowered women demanding equality, feminists are weak, insecure people who cannot handle equality.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
06-04-2019, 05:03 AM
Post: #3
RE: Prof. Svetlana Voreskova: Why Feminism Is Poison
Feminism is not breaking up the family unit BY ACCIDENT. It is doing so BY DESIGN.


[Image: 721.jpg]

It's not a bug, it's a feature.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
06-04-2019, 05:30 AM
Post: #4
RE: Prof. Svetlana Voreskova: Why Feminism Is Poison
Meryl Streep slams term 'toxic masculinity': 'Women can be pretty f---ing toxic'-------


https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/201...-women-ca/
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
06-04-2019, 06:02 AM
Post: #5
RE: Prof. Svetlana Voreskova: Why Feminism Is Poison
(06-04-2019 05:30 AM)karasu Wrote:  Meryl Streep slams term 'toxic masculinity': 'Women can be pretty f---ing toxic'-------


https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/201...-women-ca/

Meryl Streep just wants it both ways. She wants to be a feminist icon, but she also doesn't want to get slated for her involvement with Harvey Weinstein #notMeToo
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
06-04-2019, 02:12 PM
Post: #6
RE: Prof. Svetlana Voreskova: Why Feminism Is Poison
this whole issue is insanity

there cannot be equality among unequals

and by unequal I don't mean better or worse.

men and women are natural complements, yet the NWO has destroyed this.

now people view relationships as cheap flings and bail at the first sign of any stress or hardship.

the bonding process nowadays is tough, esp. since another potential mate is a flick of a finger away on your smartphone.

infidelity, promiscuity causes more practical harm than what SJWs consider racism in today's society... infidelity leads to broken homes, which leads to poorer outcomes and a rise in criminality.

yet the mass media continues to ignore simple facts.

Racism is bad because it's NET NEGATIVE ON SOCIETY.. but they don't apply the same STANDARDS towards PROMISCUITY which breaks up homes and leads to single motherhood/fatherhood.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
06-04-2019, 02:22 PM
Post: #7
RE: Prof. Svetlana Voreskova: Why Feminism Is Poison
and when the LEADER which sets the standard for 'the people' has MULTIPLE DIVORCE and extra-marital relationships with PORNstars then 'the people' which look to him for example are going to hero-worship his example and try to emulate his debauchery for some Jerry Springer MAGA
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
06-04-2019, 02:31 PM
Post: #8
RE: Prof. Svetlana Voreskova: Why Feminism Is Poison
Donald Trump does set a poor example.

You can just tell he's a sleazeball. for a moment he was a breath of fresh of air, but he quickly became toxic

now he's just your run of the mill NEOCON
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread: Author Replies: Views: Last Post
  4 Prof.Redneck's NWO Academic Research :) karasu 6 672 01-28-2019 04:31 PM
Last Post: karasu
  Paypal Shuts down Prof James Tracey's PAYPAL ACCOUNT! pug-thug 13 3,244 01-24-2019 04:27 AM
Last Post: pug-thug
  DIRECTOR OF HARVARD’S NIEMAN JOURNALISM LAB DOXXES TEMPLE JOURNALISM PROF pug-thug 2 917 05-11-2018 05:42 PM
Last Post: pug-thug
  Attractive Hapa woman attacks feminism and supports Traditional family pug-thug 16 5,142 04-27-2018 09:03 PM
Last Post: pug-thug

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)