July 21, 1969: Man walks on the Moon for the 1st time?

[KurtDangle]

nasa changed focus from apollo to the space shuttle. they dont have an unlimited budget

[Roland Bates]

https://www.space.com/biden-nasa-artemis...e-timeline

"NASA's quest to put boots back on the moon will likely get less urgent after President-elect Joe Biden takes office next month.

Through its Artemis program, the space agency has been working to land two astronauts, including the first-ever female moonwalker, near the lunar south pole by 2024. That ambitious deadline, which was announced by Vice President Mike Pence in 2019, will likely be relaxed under the Biden administration, experts say.

"I expect the 2024 goal to go away," space policy expert John Logsdon, a professor emeritus of political science and international affairs at George Washington University's Elliott School of International Affairs in Washington, D.C., told Space.com.

Eric Stallmer, executive vice president of government affairs and public policy at Voyager Space Holdings, agreed with that assessment.

"I think people will reassess the timeline for sure," Stallmer, who served as president of the Commercial Spaceflight Federation from 2014 until this autumn, told Space.com. "And, candidly, I don't think anyone thought that 2024 timeline was realistic. It was ambitious and aspirational, but I don't think realistic."

That doesn't mean Artemis itself will get the axe, however. Indeed, both Logsdon and Stallmer think the program and its long-term goals — establishing a sustainable presence on and around the moon, and using such efforts to prepare for crewed missions to Mars — will remain on firm footing after Biden takes office.

The president-elect hasn't said much publicly about NASA or space exploration to date. However, Logsdon pointed to the Democratic Party's official 2020 platform, stressing that it's "very bullish on human exploration."

And the platform explicitly endorses the broad Artemis vision: "We support NASA's work to return Americans to the moon and go beyond to Mars, taking the next step in exploring our solar system."

Human space exploration also seems to enjoy wide support, both on Capitol Hill and throughout the country.

"At least among the attentive public, there's a pretty firm consensus that it's time to start exploration, and that the moon is the appropriate first destination," Logsdon said.

[Chaos Reigns]

LOL

Shifting the goal posts.

I said that the 2024 'deadline' was just a carrot, that would get dangled, always 4 or 5 years away.

[Chaos Reigns]

A good way to box Kamala in, once she pushes Joe down a flight of stairs, will be to ask her when the first female BIPOC will walk on the lunar surface.

[Roland Bates]

(12-31-2020 06:19 AM)Chaos Reigns Wrote:  A good way to box Kamala in, once she pushes Joe down a flight of stairs, will be to ask her when the first female BIPOC will walk on the lunar surface.

LOL

[KurtDangle]

a change in administration, means push opposite of the previous administration.

it takes 10 years of push to get a moon mission, thats 2-3 administrations

surprised ?

it shows thats the reason we havent gone back, its not a technology issue, its a political/money issue

[Señor Penis]

My nigga, we never went! LOL

You need to take a serious look at the footage of the landing and tell me that ain’t the fakest shit you ever seen.

A phone call to the moon from a landline? Cmon dawg.

[Señor Penis]

The moon cannot be landed on. It’s a damn luminarie. Nothing to land on.

We can’t leave lower earth orbit. Why do you think the rockets curve everytime? Whats with the ballon satellites? What’s with all the cgi?

Why all Cgi? Don’t we have cameras up there?

It’s very comical that some of you still believe the lies.


China has the fakest Cgi out of the bunch. Lmao

[Chaos Reigns]

(12-31-2020 02:54 PM)KurtDangle Wrote:  a change in administration, means push opposite of the previous administration.

it takes 10 years of push to get a moon mission, thats 2-3 administrations

surprised ?

it shows thats the reason we havent gone back, its not a technology issue, its a political/money issue

"We choose to go to the Moon" - September 1962

"The Eagle has landed" - July 1969

Help me out here. Is that 10 years?

[EVILYOSHIDA]

[Chaos Reigns]

100% Revelation of the Method.

Great vid, great post.

[KurtDangle]

(01-01-2021 09:46 AM)Chaos Reigns Wrote:  

(12-31-2020 02:54 PM)KurtDangle Wrote:  a change in administration, means push opposite of the previous administration.

it takes 10 years of push to get a moon mission, thats 2-3 administrations

surprised ?

it shows thats the reason we havent gone back, its not a technology issue, its a political/money issue

"We choose to go to the Moon" - September 1962

"The Eagle has landed" - July 1969

Help me out here. Is that 10 years?

mercury started in 58, and gemini in 61

[EVILYOSHIDA]

(01-03-2021 06:15 AM)Chaos Reigns Wrote:  100% Revelation of the Method.

Great vid, great post.

where's my vote up? ha

HAPPY NEW YEAR

[Chaos Reigns]

(01-03-2021 09:11 AM)KurtDangle Wrote:  

(01-01-2021 09:46 AM)Chaos Reigns Wrote:  

(12-31-2020 02:54 PM)KurtDangle Wrote:  a change in administration, means push opposite of the previous administration.

it takes 10 years of push to get a moon mission, thats 2-3 administrations

surprised ?

it shows thats the reason we havent gone back, its not a technology issue, its a political/money issue

"We choose to go to the Moon" - September 1962

"The Eagle has landed" - July 1969

Help me out here. Is that 10 years?

mercury started in 58, and gemini in 61

So you are saying we need to redevelop Mercury and Gemini level tech?

LOL

I thought the problem wasn't the tech, I thought it was political will/funding?

First crewed Mercury flight was in May 1961, btw. Are we not capable of sending crews into orbit today? That would mean we are capable of Mercury level missions today, no?

Either way, if the Apollo Program was legit (which is one massive if) then we can clearly say that it should take 7 years TOPS to go from manned orbital flight, to a crewed lunar landing.

[KurtDangle]

yes, it take money (4.4% of the national budget) and time to test and develop a powerful enough rocket. they didnt make the saturn v in one try.

just like the SLS is under development now.