Login | Register

Post Reply 
TJ sotomayor on black women's hair
07-02-2016, 01:41 PM (This post was last modified: 07-02-2016 01:42 PM by Dagwood.)
Post: #16
RE: TJ sotomayor on black women's hair
BTW... My eastern European Volga-German & Irish farming family were Canadian settlers who got a huge free government handout of land too.

The free handout is the only reason hundreds of us live in one of the safest and highest standard of living places in the world. And, it's the only fucking reason most of those in today's family generation have $400K-$1M+, homes, 2+ cars, atv's, boats, cabins at the lake & fly to excotic places for warm weather vacations.

AND... That is all a very rich windfall based on sacrifice & loss on the entire race and culture of indians here.
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
07-02-2016, 02:32 PM
Post: #17
TJ sotomayor on black women's hair
[Image: a602adbf8e0dc19c29ffa53555e12976.jpg]

--I Eat Grits--
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
07-02-2016, 03:18 PM
Post: #18
RE: TJ sotomayor on black women's hair
(07-02-2016 02:32 PM)Billygoat Wrote:  [Image: a602adbf8e0dc19c29ffa53555e12976.jpg]

A silly meme is no argument for ignorance and a lack of education on a subject.

Reverse the circumstances on an entire continent of native whites and their entire culture... and today you too would be living on a 3rd world white indian reserve with nothing. No viable land to farm, no jobs, no prospects waiting for your Red Indian/Colonist/settler-financed government welfare check to survive.
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
07-02-2016, 03:20 PM
Post: #19
RE: TJ sotomayor on black women's hair
(07-02-2016 01:20 PM)Dagwood Wrote:  
(07-02-2016 11:06 AM)Billygoat Wrote:  
(07-02-2016 10:58 AM)Dagwood Wrote:  
(07-02-2016 09:49 AM)Count Iblis Wrote:  
(07-02-2016 04:07 AM)kungfool Wrote:  I think this all stems from Black Men lusting after White Women.
If this weren't the case, Black Women could really take pride in their natural look.

Plus, a lot of them are overweight. I'd gander that statistically, they're up there on the obesity charts.
I don't think anyone is really turned off by athletic, fit Black Women. What do you guys think?

I can't speak for anyone else but me. Even though I'd love to see blacks go back to Africa I'd be lying if I said there are no hot black women.

I'm pretty sure most American Indians would love to see you whites go back to europe and take with you the people you kidnapped, enslaved and brought there.
They'd want them to come back once their checks stopped coming in the mail.


Not if you were forced to restock the 100's of millions of buffalo and other wild game you decimated.. or if they get back access to land that can actually support farming unlike the shit, scrub, non-crop sustaining land they we were forced onto in the internment camps they were put in so the white settlers could 'exclusively' have all viable income-sustaining land leaving them with no way of providing for themselves and their hunting ranges gone.

Most of of the United States of America was built by millions white immigrants getting FREE government handouts...

... of homestead land taken by force from someone else. Taken forcibly while those someone elses were slaughtered, poisoned, given small pox, starved by organized government mass slaughter of their main food source... and forced by gunpoint into internement camps with no way there of feeding themselves.

All that every American has tiday that has been earned, grown and built there has been done off the backs of America Indians through deception, genocide, illegal annexation & a whole lot more crimes against humanity.

A HUGE percentage the white population in America is there and successful today due to the biggest free government handout program in US history. Much of the self righteous entitled American white populous that claims they have earned everything they got to get where they are completely full of shit. Their whole standard of living and lifestyle today is based on the biggest government hand out ever! And the free land it was stolen from someone else!

There were also millions of European immigrants who ended up in the major cities and towns without money to their name and without government benefits as an option.

In addition, there was the matter of developing the land from nothing, often under harsh conditions.

I don't minimise the impact that European settlement had on Aboriginal culture, let alone the atrocities that were committed against these groups, but the European settlers did not have it easy, certainly compared to immigrants today.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
07-02-2016, 03:21 PM
Post: #20
RE: TJ sotomayor on black women's hair
the genocide of the native americans is one of the saddest chapter's in human history

the US is stolen land.

What they need to do is give an entire state to what's left of the native americans
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
07-02-2016, 03:26 PM
Post: #21
RE: TJ sotomayor on black women's hair
(07-02-2016 03:18 PM)Dagwood Wrote:  
(07-02-2016 02:32 PM)Billygoat Wrote:  [Image: a602adbf8e0dc19c29ffa53555e12976.jpg]

A silly meme is no argument for ignorance and a lack of education on a subject.

Reverse the circumstances on an entire continent of native whites and their entire culture... and today you too would be living on a 3rd world white indian reserve with nothing. No viable land to farm, no jobs, no prospects waiting for your Red Indian/Colonist/settler-financed government welfare check to survive.

It seem that much of European history consists of the common man being exploited by the upper class, including having their plots of land stolen from them or taken over.

Man's inhumanity to man seems pretty universal.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
07-02-2016, 03:30 PM
Post: #22
RE: TJ sotomayor on black women's hair
Europeans in general are just very very aggressive. to some extent I agree with the PC paradigm, they must be held in check because if left unchecked I do believe they still have a high capacity for racism. if you want to see what they are really like check out how they are at soccer games or when the are rocking out to death metal. that' show they sublimate their inner aggressiveness in the age of PC

however I do think they went too far with the PC bullshit and the white man is sort of unfairly maligned in today's society
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
07-02-2016, 04:20 PM
Post: #23
RE: TJ sotomayor on black women's hair
(07-02-2016 03:30 PM)EVILYOSHIDA Wrote:  Europeans in general are just very very aggressive. to some extent I agree with the PC paradigm, they must be held in check because if left unchecked I do believe they still have a high capacity for racism. if you want to see what they are really like check out how they are at soccer games or when the are rocking out to death metal. that' show they sublimate their inner aggressiveness in the age of PC

however I do think they went too far with the PC bullshit and the white man is sort of unfairly maligned in today's society

All groups have the proclivity for aggression under the right conditions. Europeans are by no means unique.

Will elaborate later.

Also, your football example is a very poor illustration of this point, as the problem of violent football fans extends around the globe (e.g., Brazil, Egypt, Western Asia, Western Africa, Central and South America); the problem is hardly restricted to Europe.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
07-02-2016, 04:29 PM
Post: #24
RE: TJ sotomayor on black women's hair
(07-02-2016 03:20 PM)BRIC Countries Wrote:  
(07-02-2016 01:20 PM)Dagwood Wrote:  
(07-02-2016 11:06 AM)Billygoat Wrote:  
(07-02-2016 10:58 AM)Dagwood Wrote:  
(07-02-2016 09:49 AM)Count Iblis Wrote:  I can't speak for anyone else but me. Even though I'd love to see blacks go back to Africa I'd be lying if I said there are no hot black women.

I'm pretty sure most American Indians would love to see you whites go back to europe and take with you the people you kidnapped, enslaved and brought there.
They'd want them to come back once their checks stopped coming in the mail.


Not if you were forced to restock the 100's of millions of buffalo and other wild game you decimated.. or if they get back access to land that can actually support farming unlike the shit, scrub, non-crop sustaining land they we were forced onto in the internment camps they were put in so the white settlers could 'exclusively' have all viable income-sustaining land leaving them with no way of providing for themselves and their hunting ranges gone.

Most of of the United States of America was built by millions white immigrants getting FREE government handouts...

... of homestead land taken by force from someone else. Taken forcibly while those someone elses were slaughtered, poisoned, given small pox, starved by organized government mass slaughter of their main food source... and forced by gunpoint into internement camps with no way there of feeding themselves.

All that every American has tiday that has been earned, grown and built there has been done off the backs of America Indians through deception, genocide, illegal annexation & a whole lot more crimes against humanity.

A HUGE percentage the white population in America is there and successful today due to the biggest free government handout program in US history. Much of the self righteous entitled American white populous that claims they have earned everything they got to get where they are completely full of shit. Their whole standard of living and lifestyle today is based on the biggest government hand out ever! And the free land it was stolen from someone else!

There were also millions of European immigrants who ended up in the major cities and towns without money to their name and without government benefits as an option.

In addition, there was the matter of developing the land from nothing, often under harsh conditions.

I don't minimise the impact that European settlement had on the Aboriginal culture, let alone the atrocities that were committed against these groups, but the European settlers did not have it easy, certainly compared to immigrants today.

I'm 3rd generation European farmer/Canadian homesteading immigrant. I live right smack in the middle of where the last stand by native Indians vs colonial forces occurred in the Americas. This region has by far and away the largest Indian population in Canada & the US. Almost 20% of the population here is native Indian and Metis (French fur trader-Indian heritage). That is double the black & Asian demographics of the US and a fair bit more than the Hispanics.

Their is an unbelievable gap in education, poverty rates, employment and income between the almost 80% whites here and in the native community.

To this day, the remotely placed internment camp/reserves away from the major commerce centers, where the entire Indian population was interred until only the last 2 decades... are unfarmable with no employment opportunity. Again... unfarmable by design so only white settlers got all the land that could actually sustain farming to feed & support themselves.

The Canadian government had to set up a welfare system to keep them from total starvation while at the same time they were unwelcome in the settlements and when looking for employment... were prohibited from getting jobs due to unbridled hate & racism.

A lot of native people have been forced to come to the cities in the past 20 years here looking for a better life but face huge challenges. This place is 10X more bigoted than any redneck southern US region could be. I spent 2 summers in the south when I just out of university. So, I stand by that.

Good luck trying to get a job as an Indian or rent an apartment here today. Your odds are 1000X better as a white person... and not much less as a new Asian, Middle Eastern or African immigrant here today. New dark skinned immigrants are treated waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay better than Indians are here. Within the first month or so the Pakistani, Indian, Asian, African and now Syrian new immigrants talk down on the aboriginal Indians here. The get bigoted to natives by the rest of the population overnight and relish that there is someone lower on the totem pole (ha) then they are.

So, even though my European grandmother & grandfather immigrant farmers overcame huge obstacles breaking the 'free' land they were given, dryland farming and surviving the harsh climate here... in no way can what they did, or what their children, grand children or great grandchildren have faced after that start... ever be compared to the early and ongoing plight of Indians in Canada. Or, the US for that matter.
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
07-02-2016, 04:41 PM
Post: #25
RE: TJ sotomayor on black women's hair
(07-02-2016 04:20 PM)BRIC Countries Wrote:  
(07-02-2016 03:30 PM)EVILYOSHIDA Wrote:  Europeans in general are just very very aggressive. to some extent I agree with the PC paradigm, they must be held in check because if left unchecked I do believe they still have a high capacity for racism. if you want to see what they are really like check out how they are at soccer games or when the are rocking out to death metal. that' show they sublimate their inner aggressiveness in the age of PC

however I do think they went too far with the PC bullshit and the white man is sort of unfairly maligned in today's society

All groups have the proclivity for aggression under the right conditions. Europeans are by no means unique.

Will elaborate later.

Also, your football example is a very poor illustration of this point, as the problem of violent football fans extends around the globe (e.g., Brazil, Egypt, Western Asia, Western Africa, Central and South America); the problem is hardly restricted to Europe.

it was just an example to show how they channel their aggression in the age of PC

I believe my point still stands. If europeans and their descendants were/are not aggressive they would not be ruling the world today. White people basically own the whole world. USA = white country = 900 bases in 130 countries. White nationalists totally underestimate white dominance throughout the world.

Those who know, know! Big Grin
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
07-02-2016, 04:42 PM
Post: #26
RE: TJ sotomayor on black women's hair
by aggressive I don't necessarily mean violent.. it could also mean need to control and dominate.

the domination desire of western europeans and their descendants is unparalleled. I think we can all agree on this. they wanted it the most, so they got what they wanted, near total world domination
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
07-02-2016, 04:56 PM
Post: #27
RE: TJ sotomayor on black women's hair
White nationalism would be much more credible if they lobbied to give free land back to the natives.

it's win win. The natives get some of their land back, and they leave white people to do their own thing.

I think this should be a strategy.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
07-03-2016, 12:43 AM
Post: #28
RE: TJ sotomayor on black women's hair
(07-02-2016 10:58 AM)Dagwood Wrote:  
(07-02-2016 09:49 AM)Count Iblis Wrote:  
(07-02-2016 04:07 AM)kungfool Wrote:  I think this all stems from Black Men lusting after White Women.
If this weren't the case, Black Women could really take pride in their natural look.

Plus, a lot of them are overweight. I'd gander that statistically, they're up there on the obesity charts.
I don't think anyone is really turned off by athletic, fit Black Women. What do you guys think?

I can't speak for anyone else but me. Even though I'd love to see blacks go back to Africa I'd be lying if I said there are no hot black women.

I'm pretty sure most American Indians would love to see you whites go back to europe and take with you the people you kidnapped, enslaved and brought there.

They probably would, but technically it was the blacks and Arabs who enslaved the blacks, sent them to the US on Jewish ships, sold them to the white man (and also some black men), and then whites set them free. Whites going back to Europe is even less likely than blacks going back to Africa. We can all dream though.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
07-03-2016, 03:26 AM
Post: #29
RE: TJ sotomayor on black women's hair
(07-02-2016 04:41 PM)EVILYOSHIDA Wrote:  
(07-02-2016 04:20 PM)BRIC Countries Wrote:  
(07-02-2016 03:30 PM)EVILYOSHIDA Wrote:  Europeans in general are just very very aggressive. to some extent I agree with the PC paradigm, they must be held in check because if left unchecked I do believe they still have a high capacity for racism. if you want to see what they are really like check out how they are at soccer games or when the are rocking out to death metal. that' show they sublimate their inner aggressiveness in the age of PC

however I do think they went too far with the PC bullshit and the white man is sort of unfairly maligned in today's society

All groups have the proclivity for aggression under the right conditions. Europeans are by no means unique.

Will elaborate later.

Also, your football example is a very poor illustration of this point, as the problem of violent football fans extends around the globe (e.g., Brazil, Egypt, Western Asia, Western Africa, Central and South America); the problem is hardly restricted to Europe.

it was just an example to show how they channel their aggression in the age of PC

I believe my point still stands. If europeans and their descendants were/are not aggressive they would not be ruling the world today. White people basically own the whole world. USA = white country = 900 bases in 130 countries. White nationalists totally underestimate white dominance throughout the world.

You seem to be conflating opportunity and domination with aggression.

That is, you assume that other groups, if given the opportunity, wouldn't act the same way and, possibly, worse. History proves your point wrong.

Also, calling the U.S. a 'White country' is like calling a neo-conservative traditional. In this context, it's an empty label devoid of substance.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
07-03-2016, 03:30 AM
Post: #30
RE: TJ sotomayor on black women's hair
other groups with supposedly higher intelligence did not engage in the same behavior for many time periods, presumably due to less desire.

for example the Chinese and Japanese were hermit kingdoms when they had higher technology in the west.

Jared Diamond was at a loss to explain why China did not go on to dominate the world due to their superior technology and infrastructure relative to europe in the late middle ages.

Japan had the best guns in the world around 1700 but banned them because they felt it was dishonorable to use them. I don't think it's fair to say everyone would have done the same given the same situation.

the European man has an exploration mentality. he likes exploring, knowing and then ultimately conquering. it's just in his basic nature. On the plus side, it also contributes to their superior ability in terms of discovery and innovation. on the debit side, it also means they colonize and conquer others more readily
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread: Author Replies: Views: Last Post
  Does anyone here cut their own hair? Winnson 73 4,998 03-22-2017 06:10 AM
Last Post: Winnson
  Sandy Hook: Dawn Hochsprung impossible hair growth SherlockShields 40 7,086 09-05-2016 05:12 AM
Last Post: EVILYOSHIDA
  Wealthy Chinese Minnesota family forced Chinese nanny to eat her own hair EVILYOSHIDA 2 735 07-21-2016 11:03 AM
Last Post: sparkuri
  Hilarious Trump Game. Blow his hair with a limp trumpet EVILYOSHIDA 0 710 02-06-2016 06:05 PM
Last Post: EVILYOSHIDA

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)