Evil Academy

Full Version: MAN DIES AFTER COPS BREAK NECK, SEVER SPINE, BRUISE BRAIN, SNAP LEG, CRUSH LARYNX
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48
You are exploiting isolated incidents to push an anti cop narrative.

No context whatsoever. No understanding of why police brutality exists. No logical reasoning whatsoever. No sense of perspective.

I mean if you are so fundamentally against the police (the vast, vast majority of blacks criminals are never apprehended, either, so don't give me this "They never get punished!" BS), then I am going to have to assume that you are pro criminal.

It's the same with these "black lives matter" retards. Yes police who break the law should be punished. Nobody is saying that what they did was justified. But statistically, you are much, much more likely to be killed by a blacks than by a cop.

And the cops are here to protect EVERYBODY (including the blacks) from these savage criminals. What part of this do you anti cop crusaders not understand?

Police brutality is a drop in the bucket. It's like somebody complaining about a scratch on his knee while daughter is being raped to death six feet away. No sense of perspective. No logical thinking skills.



.
(04-25-2015 07:41 AM)Hellfire Awaits Wrote: [ -> ]
(04-25-2015 07:27 AM)EVILYOSHIDA Wrote: [ -> ]^ no your logic holds no weight.

Your logic is since that blacks are overrepresented in crime stats they deserve to be brutalized by the cops.

that is imbecilic.

this has NOTHING TO DO WITH RACE. it's about COPS having ZERO ACCOUNTABILITY for their MURDEROUS ACTIONS.

If you can't see this go back to Community college and take a logic class.


Men are vastly, vastly more likely to suffer from police brutality than females.

Police cannot act the same around males and females, because their behavior is nowhere close to the same. And some of those men are innocent.


Why don't you go complain about that? How come this is acceptable but the black white disparity is not?


Logic? How does it work?



.....

The cops vastly outnumber suspects by a large margin.

the cops have vastly stronger firepower and weaponry.

there is no reason why anyone should be brutalized or murdered by the cops in most situations.

If a certain race is more prone to crime, then yes arrest them more and put them through trial. There is no reason to brutalize suspects.

None whatsoever.
(04-25-2015 07:22 AM)DonJohnson Wrote: [ -> ]once again, focusing on single case scenerio



sensationalisation

A case by case basis is how events should be judged. Vast sweeping generalizations are always wrong.

That's not to say there is no truth in some racial stereotypes, but when it comes to interactions between individuals you can judge things objectively without race being an issue at all.
(04-25-2015 04:33 AM)DonJohnson Wrote: [ -> ]
(04-25-2015 04:08 AM)BRIC Countries Wrote: [ -> ]
(04-25-2015 03:15 AM)DonJohnson Wrote: [ -> ]
(04-25-2015 02:16 AM)BRIC Countries Wrote: [ -> ]
(04-25-2015 12:02 AM)DonJohnson Wrote: [ -> ]exaggerating?

why don't you prove your point by listing all the affluent black communities instead of lying.


black community = black majority residents

lol @ stating the obvious. of course that's all we are doing. stating the obvious that your cuckolds can't see.

You said, "there's isn't a single affluent black community in all of North America"

and

"i would like to see the stats of which black neighorbood has below national average crime rates.
"[/b]

and

"last time i studied US demographics there was only a single black community in the US with a higher than average national income(still not affluent btw)"

Whereas,

http://atlantablackstar.com/2014/01/03/1...s-america/

compared to

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_hig...ed_States\


I doubt that communities with median incomes in the range of what are listed in the first link I provided would have higher than national average crime statistics. Just a hunch, of course.



i don't have the time but i just disproved the #1 and #2 listed communities listed on there

http://maps.latimes.com/neighborhoods/ne...screnshaw/



Baldwin Hills, CA has a median family income of $37,948 median household income (2008 dollars), low for the city of Los Angeles and low for the county



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/View_Park%E...California


#1 on that list, only has an household income of $77,475.





the definition of affluence in the united states is 100K+ family household income.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affluence_i...ted_States





Let me ask again,


why do you post lies? what is your motive?


"[2nd] on the list", Baldwin Hills, is clumped together with low-income Crenshaw.

I've looked over a couple of the listed neighborhoods and I'm not finding what you're claiming -- that is, they exceeded 100 000.

Your original point was there was not one example.




does this retard realize baldwin hills + crenshaw TOGETHER is only 2400 families?

So you want to go lower? How about we just look at oprah and Michael Jordan as wealthy African American communities to disprove my point. Is that your critieria for debunking my claim?

Baldwin Hills + Crenshaw is defined as one neighborhood. Simple as that.


#1 on the list only has an average household income of 77K. that is not 100K+.




Now my question, Why do you lie? What is your motive?

Neighborhoods may get defined one way in official data and another way by residents.

Neighborhoods are also amalgamated.

The are much smaller examples of affluent neighborhoods.

The map indicates they are (geographically) separate.

Also, "It [Baldwin Hills/Crenshaw] is divided between the upscale, principally home-owning Baldwin Hills residential district to the south and a more concentrated apartment area to the north, just south of Jefferson Boulevard. A commercial corridor along Crenshaw Boulevard, including the Baldwin Hills Crenshaw Plaza, unites the two."

It's not unlike Upper Manhattan's Morningside Heights vs. Harlem;

Chicago's Hyde Park vs. neighboring South Side communities;

Toronto's Cabbage Town vs. Regent Park;

Vancouver's Downtown East Side vs. Gastown/Chinatown.
(04-25-2015 07:48 AM)EVILYOSHIDA Wrote: [ -> ]
(04-25-2015 07:41 AM)Hellfire Awaits Wrote: [ -> ]
(04-25-2015 07:27 AM)EVILYOSHIDA Wrote: [ -> ]^ no your logic holds no weight.

Your logic is since that blacks are overrepresented in crime stats they deserve to be brutalized by the cops.

that is imbecilic.

this has NOTHING TO DO WITH RACE. it's about COPS having ZERO ACCOUNTABILITY for their MURDEROUS ACTIONS.

If you can't see this go back to Community college and take a logic class.


Men are vastly, vastly more likely to suffer from police brutality than females.

Police cannot act the same around males and females, because their behavior is nowhere close to the same. And some of those men are innocent.


Why don't you go complain about that? How come this is acceptable but the black white disparity is not?


Logic? How does it work?



.....

The cops vastly outnumber suspects by a large margin.

the cops have vastly stronger firepower and weaponry.

there is no reason why anyone should be brutalized or murdered by the cops in most situations.

If a certain race is more prone to crime, then yes arrest them more and put them through trial. There is no reason to brutalize suspects.

None whatsoever.


1) the fuck they outnumber criminal suspects. Are you high? Do you want me to post statistics here?

2) they need stronger firepower and weaponry because Ray Ray and Quanzell are carrying dangerous weapons, too. In any other scenario, the criminal will be better armed than the cop. Do you want cops to be armed with butter knives instead?


3) the vast majority of criminal suspects are never brutalized.

In fact even in the minority of cases where brutality occurs, the criminal did something seriously retarded to invite the wrath of the cop. Running away from arrest is not an innocent matter. Many such people (esp negros) then try to shoot at the cops from a distance. This places their lives in danger, which is why cops take extreme measures against runway suspects.

If you actually watch the thousands and thousands of videos being posted, the entire anti-cop narrative crumbles into ashes.

Explain to me why they never target the chinaman like this? Where is the Japanese American Mike Brown?


4) brutality needs to be limited under reasonable means.

But CTards have no clue where this brutality comes from, and why the police are always on edge. How many of even knew that the blacks IQ scores are largely responsible for the large % of trigger happy cops?

I mean if you cannot correctly diagnose the root of a problem, then your solutions are worse than useless. Anybody who hates cops more than they hate these criminal gangbangers is a waste of breathing space.



..
(04-25-2015 07:54 AM)BRIC Countries Wrote: [ -> ]
(04-25-2015 04:33 AM)DonJohnson Wrote: [ -> ]
(04-25-2015 04:08 AM)BRIC Countries Wrote: [ -> ]
(04-25-2015 03:15 AM)DonJohnson Wrote: [ -> ]
(04-25-2015 02:16 AM)BRIC Countries Wrote: [ -> ]You said, "there's isn't a single affluent black community in all of North America"

and

"i would like to see the stats of which black neighorbood has below national average crime rates.
"[/b]

and

"last time i studied US demographics there was only a single black community in the US with a higher than average national income(still not affluent btw)"

Whereas,

http://atlantablackstar.com/2014/01/03/1...s-america/

compared to

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_hig...ed_States\


I doubt that communities with median incomes in the range of what are listed in the first link I provided would have higher than national average crime statistics. Just a hunch, of course.



i don't have the time but i just disproved the #1 and #2 listed communities listed on there

http://maps.latimes.com/neighborhoods/ne...screnshaw/



Baldwin Hills, CA has a median family income of $37,948 median household income (2008 dollars), low for the city of Los Angeles and low for the county



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/View_Park%E...California


#1 on that list, only has an household income of $77,475.





the definition of affluence in the united states is 100K+ family household income.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affluence_i...ted_States





Let me ask again,


why do you post lies? what is your motive?


"[2nd] on the list", Baldwin Hills, is clumped together with low-income Crenshaw.

I've looked over a couple of the listed neighborhoods and I'm not finding what you're claiming -- that is, they exceeded 100 000.

Your original point was there was not one example.




does this retard realize baldwin hills + crenshaw TOGETHER is only 2400 families?

So you want to go lower? How about we just look at oprah and Michael Jordan as wealthy African American communities to disprove my point. Is that your critieria for debunking my claim?

Baldwin Hills + Crenshaw is defined as one neighborhood. Simple as that.


#1 on the list only has an average household income of 77K. that is not 100K+.




Now my question, Why do you lie? What is your motive?

Neighborhoods may get defined one way in official data and another way by residents.

Neighborhoods are also amalgamated.

The are much smaller examples of affluent neighborhoods.

The map indicates they are (geographically) separate.

Also, "It [Baldwin Hills/Crenshaw] is divided between the upscale, principally home-owning Baldwin Hills residential district to the south and a more concentrated apartment area to the north, just south of Jefferson Boulevard. A commercial corridor along Crenshaw Boulevard, including the Baldwin Hills Crenshaw Plaza, unites the two."

It's not unlike Upper Manhattan's Morningside Heights vs. Harlem;

Chicago's Hyde Park vs. neighboring South Side communities;

Toronto's Cabbage Town vs. Regent Park;

Vancouver's Downtown East Side vs. Gastown/Chinatown.



when you have to reach this far and wide for a divided opinion of territory over such a small sample pool......... all for a single exception, you've already lost the argument.


you know this right?



what's your motive other than cuckolding at this late stage of the game? I mean.... this exchange is as good as a mirror.
Nice thread.

Though I do find the level of anti Canadianism/Australianism a little disappointing.
I seriously can't wait until cops everywhere are required to wear body cameras.

Once they start uploading videos of their daily interactions with the blacks.... Even the most sheltered, PC cuckold will be unable to defend his anti cop narrative.

It's not as simple as "these negros were minding their own business and the racist cracka shot them!" This will do even greater damage to the reputation of the blacks than World Star Hip Hop. Evidence for their buffoonery will be impossible to ignore.


..
Garbage in, garbage out.
Quote:1) the fuck they outnumber criminal suspects. Are you high? Do you want me to post statistics here?

are you autistic?

I was talking about when they engage in police confrontations. The cops always outnumber the suspects they seek to arrest.
(04-25-2015 08:06 AM)EVILYOSHIDA Wrote: [ -> ]
Quote:1) the fuck they outnumber criminal suspects. Are you high? Do you want me to post statistics here?

are you autistic?

I was talking about when they engage in police confrontations. The cops always outnumber the suspects they seek to arrest.


You seriously have no logical thinking skills.

If you don't understand why the cop / criminal ratio has to be high when an arrest is made, then your mind is so far gone it cannot be rescued.

The cops cannot risk their health on the job. They have to be available to make arrests over and over again, thousands of times within the span of a career... It is extremely expensive for the government to retrain and commission a new cop, every time another cop retires / quits / is injured on the job. Even the slightest risk to their lives ought to be minimized, if possible.

In a scenario where the criminal and the cop are more evenly matched, then the police force will be decimated within a matter of months. Go look at a shithole like Oakland and tell me "the cop has an unfair advantage over the blacks"! The hell they do.



.....
The USA is the only developed country in the world without gun control.

This means it is easier for a blacks to obtain a gun than it is for a chinaman to fail his porn audition. Go to Facebook or Twitter and you'll see thousands of social media accounts of blacks TEENAGERS posing with real weapons.

This is totally unimaginable from a European or Asian perspective.

Now knowing that negros are likely to carry weapons that can cause permanent injury (or death) to a cop, even from a great distance, why do you want the cop and the blacks to be evenly matched? Why do you want lenient policing tactics?


..
This isn't a very productive conversation.

It's possible to want people in poor communities to improve themselves by making better lifestyle choices AND for police to do actual police work instead of just being bullies on the road.

Because these days... That's all they do. There are no cops out there solving crimes anymore. That shit doesn't happen ever.
It's not their fault that the drug war is a failure and was always meant to be a failure. But they don't have to be such dicks out there either.
...


Cu-c-c-cu-CUCK!



Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48
Reference URL's