Evil Academy

Full Version: New Radical Divide and Conquer tactics by Feminists. The "STARE RAPE"
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3
[Image: aqfJWQa.jpg]
what about sexually harassing men with provocative and slutty clothing?

this is a type of VISUAL SEXUAL HARASSMENT if you think about it.

If you can give me the resources I can SCIENTIFICALLY PROVE that wearing revealing clothing causes PRIMAL IMPULSES to be activated within men that could be CONSTITUTED AS VISUAL SEXUAL HARASSMENT.

What I am saying makes sense because you are physically affecting a man when you walk around on the street with your cleavage hanging out.

this is exactly why there are agreed up on decency laws mandating people wear pants and clothes.

revealing clothing = sexual harassment. both for men and women.
To be expected the ways things are heading in the West.

Feminism (and leftism generally) attracts mentally unstable people to its ranks.

Western women are narcissistic and entitled -- they expect to be in control of everything and, if when they're not, they are inclined to cry discrimination.

They are also the most brainwashed of the Cultural Marxist stormtroopers.

So I'm not surprised to see this type of campaign. I'm more interested in the reaction it gets from average women. They are the demographic that, while benefiting from feminism, are least supportive of the "extremist" positions, such as this one.

Radical feminist (and leftist) ideology remains on the fringe of society. However, the fringe is now what dictates to the majority, so even if women don't endorse radical feminist values, they are unlikely to speak out against them publicly, for fear of the backlash that might ensue.
[Image: tumblr_mrauylg3kA1sf2x9do1_1280.png]
^ great one.

What they are trying to do is radicalize. they are actually hoping that men and women hate each other more with these radical displays.

STRATEGY OF TENSION. basic cultural marxist technique.

i mean if they think staring = sexual harrassment, then obviously wearing revealing clothing to get MEN TO LOOK = visual sexual harassment.

it goes both ways.
It's funny how so much has gone full circle in terms of how behaviours that were previously prohibited on account of being "discriminatory" to segments of the population are now been advanced as "progressive", and that the people pushing this trend are the same people who pushed for the earlier abolition of these behaviours. That, of course, wouldn't be a cause to pause and reflect on the situation for these enlightened members of society.

Case and point:

1) Segregation -- separating groups of people had been the norm throughout history; then it was branded an inhumane act by the pillars of progress; yet now segregation is not only acceptable but expected in certain leftist milieus (e.g., "Black peoples'...[so and so]", "People of Colour...[so and so]" .

2) Coloured people -- this was previously a term restricted to a segment of the world's population; it was then re-branded, in the 60s, by progressives as racist; and now it's these same progressives who apply the term to 3/4 of the earth's population;

3) Women off limits -- Staring at women, for certain classes of men, could at certain points in history mark someone for death; then that was fought against, again, by progressives; now it's progressives that advocate social proscriptions towards "men" (likely not all men) that stare at women;

4) Discrimination -- treating people differently based on social group status was considered acceptable for much of history; then it become a sign of backwardness, particularly in the 60s, which led to the introduction of legislation to ensure equality for all people, irrespective of social group status; now it's the state, again at the behest of progressives, that actively promotes discriminatory policies against segments of society.
(06-16-2014 04:04 AM)EVILYOSHIDA Wrote: [ -> ]^ great one.

What they are trying to do is radicalize. they are actually hoping that men and women hate each other more with these radical displays.

STRATEGY OF TENSION. basic cultural marxist technique.

i mean if they think staring = sexual harrassment, then obviously wearing revealing clothing to get MEN TO LOOK = visual sexual harassment.

it goes both ways.

Who introduced that term?
Quote:3) Women off limits -- Staring at women, for certain classes of men, could at certain points in history mark someone for death; then that was fought against, again, by progressives; now it's progressives that advocate social proscriptions towards "men" (likely not all men) that stare at women;

great point. Black men who stared at white women were fair game for lynching or tar and feathering.

these progressives are retarded. you can't stop people from LOOKING.
(06-16-2014 04:40 AM)BRIC Countries Wrote: [ -> ]
(06-16-2014 04:04 AM)EVILYOSHIDA Wrote: [ -> ]^ great one.

What they are trying to do is radicalize. they are actually hoping that men and women hate each other more with these radical displays.

STRATEGY OF TENSION. basic cultural marxist technique.

i mean if they think staring = sexual harrassment, then obviously wearing revealing clothing to get MEN TO LOOK = visual sexual harassment.

it goes both ways.

Who introduced that term?

Quote:The strategy of tension (Italian: strategia della tensione) is a theory that Western governments during the Cold war used tactics that aimed to divide, manipulate, and control public opinion using fear, propaganda, disinformation, psychological warfare, agents provocateurs, and false flag terrorist actions in order to achieve their strategic aims
these idiots just like to cause negative energy. get people in a negative state of mind. similar to drama queens that are happy when everyone is fighting or in conflict.

[Image: 1478_634414103253450_1535817921_n.jpg]
[Image: YwAwLp2.gif]
http://womenagainstfeminism.tumblr.com/p...i-feminism

Why I am against feminism (Anti-Feminism)

Okay, I have never written something like this before, because I don’t think “Anti-Feminism” is some kind of rigid ideology, creed, religion, or doctrine, even a real “ism”. I think it’s just an umbrella term for people who think there is something seriously wrong with the actions of people acting in the name of “feminism”. I use the term simply because it means “against feminism”, and I am against “feminism” for the following reasons:

Equal Rights exist, right now: Feminists are the only people who lose their minds with rage when you tell them that women already have the same exact rights as men. That’s not good enough. They want more. They desperately want to be victims. They want a privileged social position.

Censorship: Feminism is about censorship. Feminists are the most vocal promoters of censorship of First Amendment Rights, hands down. Just look at how they react to Facebook comments, Twitter speech, and here on Tumblr. They also promote censorship campaigns against opinions in the media, on blogs, and on YouTube. They promote inequality of speech.

Helpless Victim Cult: Feminism promotes the idea that women are fragile damsels-in-distress who must be rescued by an external entity (the state/patriarchy) in order to be protected from having their feelings hurt by words that they disagree with. Feminism encourages women to think in terms of weakness.

Inequality: Contrary to what it claims with a dictionary definition, Feminism is not about equality in practice. Did you hear that part?… in practice. Based on its overall actions, it is about socially engineering society to give special privileges to women and special punishments to men. That’s not equality. That’s not respecting genders. Once again, I don’t give a crap about your dictionary definition. It’s the actions that turned me against feminism. The actions don’t match the rhetoric.

Discriminatory: The very name “feminism” is discriminatory. The “fem” refers specifically to women. It can never refer to men. To say that only through women can equal rights be claimed is like saying that only through black people can people have rights.

Patriarchy Fantasy: There is no “Patriarchy” because a real patriarchy would not allow women to vote, divorce, go to college, have a career, live single, get abortions, etc. If this is a patriarchy, then it’s a pathetic patriarchy and attacking it is like attacking a little boy as if he were a man.

Gender Roles…only for men: Feminists claim to be against gender roles, but I see feminists doing nothing about men’s gender roles when it comes to working the hardest, most dangerous jobs in society. They seem perfectly okay with men being the majority of the homeless on the street. They don’t want to look at the bottom of society where they will find lots of men (along with women), thus ruining their “patriarchy” fantasy and their claims to victimhood (and stuff for free).

Equal Pay is here… but it’s your choice: The “equal pay” claim is bogus and has been debunked. Any “average” differences in pay can be shown to come down to different choices in careers that have different earnings. The easiest way for women to “narrow the pay gap” is to train for engineering, computer science, and science-based career fields (the highest paying careers around). But they would rather complain. In fact, new research shows women are out-earning men in cities.

Elitism: Feminists are elitists. They are preoccupied with elite men: CEOs, millionaires, Senators, etc. But the majority of men will never have elite status. So, feminists are out of touch with the daily reality of the vast majority of men.

Hypocrites: Feminists preach against slut-shaming only to march in the streets calling themselves sluts. They scream against “objectification” but then objectify men for their abs, looks, money, and status. They claim to be for equal rights, but they only advocate for one gender. They claim to be for “choice” but they are constantly policing other women and telling what is “okay for women to do”.

Policing other women: A lot of feminists seem to think they have been appointed the Women Police who can then go around shaming other women for the things that are “not okay”. Makeup, shaving, wearing pink, and more are all “crimes against feminism” and punishable by social attacks. Nearly every online feminist seems to be a petty dictator marching around and telling women what “true feminism” is.

Rape Culture-Fantasy: Since Feminism is all about playing the persecuted, weak, helpless victim, feminists have promoted the fantasy that we live a culture that “teaches men to rape”. But nowhere is rape taught as acceptable.Rape is illegal and is seen as a crime by most people in society. Feminists confuse dominance and submission themes as rape. Only rape is rape. Posing in a picture for perfume is not rape.

Inflated Rape Statistics: Feminists love to “cite” that “1-in-4 women are raped” during her lifetime. This is a misreading of the statistic. The real statistic is that “1-in-4 women claims sexual assault”, which can mean anything a women wants it to mean when she reports it. It can mean rape, touching, kissing, groping, or even lewd comments. “Sexual assault” can be a very broad category. But feminists only select the most shocking aspect (rape) and then claim that is the definition.

Abortion as “empowerment”: This opinion is unpopular, but I don’t agree that I need to have my baby scraped out of my uterus in order to feel empowered. But the abortion industry (i.e. Planned Parenthood) makes a ton of money off this perversion of empowerment. “Abortion as empowerment” teaches women to see their wombs as nothing but garbage bins full of disposable waste.

Okay, I could list more, but you get the point. Feminism is not what it claims to be. Anyone can recite a dictionary definition. But my rejection of feminism comes from more real-life reasons. Thank you for reading.
(06-16-2014 05:41 AM)EVILYOSHIDA Wrote: [ -> ][Image: YwAwLp2.gif]

LOL
[Image: P7zictt.gif?q%E2%80%9C%20%3Cimg%20src=]
Pages: 1 2 3
Reference URL's