Evil Academy

Full Version: July 21, 1969: Man walks on the Moon for the 1st time?
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
(08-05-2018 09:43 AM)MrOctober77 Wrote: [ -> ]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CVPBXKYidTs

This one where he supposedly says it was partially filmed. Notice this one has quite a few edits in it:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VehiY7uqpEs

Mr October, see that little TV icon at the top right of your tool bar along with the other icons? Press that and select Youtube and enter your URL. It will embed the video for you.







the fact that such a high level astronaut admitted it is mindblowing
the great thing is that if he just said Kubrick filmed the moon landings and they faked it.. the western media would have labeled him a kook

the fact that he said "they landed but some parts are fake" is actually good

because it gets the avg. joe to question the moon landing.. like hmmm if kubrick actually filmed some parts.. then what else is FAKE?
(08-05-2018 12:02 PM)pug-thug Wrote: [ -> ]the great thing is that if he just said Kubrick filmed the moon landings and they faked it.. the western media would have labeled him a kook

the fact that he said "they landed but some parts are fake" is actually good

because it gets the avg. joe to question the moon landing.. like hmmm if kubrick actually filmed some parts.. then what else is FAKE?

Another reason the Soviets didn't out the Moon landing is because it would have been viewed as simply an allegation. I get the feeling they were trying to get their hands on proof, and then, poof, Apollo 18, 19 and 20 were cancelled.

"Apollo 18 through 20 - The Cancelled Missions
There were originally 3 more Apollo missions scheduled to fly to the Moon in the initial Apollo plan, all were cancelled due to budgetary constraints. Apollo 20 was cancelled in January 1970"
(08-05-2018 11:01 AM)pug-thug Wrote: [ -> ]the fact that such a high level astronaut admitted it is mindblowing

The admission is in an clearly edited interview, the unedited version of that needs to be shown. In another interview he says it was not faked in any way.
^ is the translation incorrect?

to me he if the translation is correct he clearly talks about kubrick staging parts of it

what is your take on the moon landing?
The images really do speak for themselves. Beautiful, yes. Believable, no.

[Image: 134679-004-0B2C02A5.jpg]
You can't say that some of it was faked without implying that it was all faked, in my opinion.
There was a time where I literally believed the internet would just get bigger and bigger, and if you were previously able to find something, you will find it again (with more of less the same effort). Web sites will expand, knowledge will spread, and so on.

Now it is becoming obvious that this process is actually currently in reverse. In many ways, the internet is shrinking. Censorship, by a variety of means (some of them as mundane as the webmaster no longer paying for hosting).

I have been trying to do a bit of research on Apollo 13 recently. But 'conspiracy' information on the topic is very hard to come by!

Well, suffice it to say that signs point to it being a dramatization, to get the public interested in the Apollo Program once again. Apollo 11 was tremendously exciting, but a bit lacklustre in terms of the actual footage. Apollo 12... They 'broke' the camera within the first 30 seconds of the mission! (and if you believe that...)

And people love a bit of drama. So the idea was to give it to them. Why wait for space drama, when you can create it?

One thing I have come across with the Apollo 13 mission is... There is a lot of symbolism involving the NUMBER 13. The number of the mission itself, yes. It was launched on April 11, but the 'accident' happened on April 13! At the time of... 10:13 EST (3:13 UTC, April 14 although 13:13 is claimed, I have not been able to corroborate that).

The mission launched at 2:13 EST, April 11. How many 13s are we up to?

Right off the bat, if there was an explosion, what are the odds their 100% oxygen Command Module didn't ignite? That was after all how the Apollo 1 crew died, in a test (i.e. not even flying through space, but on a launch pad, with emergency crew on the ready).

My contention is that they needed more time to improve the SFX from what was shown in the Apollo 11 footage. They also needed another gimmick. That is, the Lunar Rover (although they waited for Apollo 15 to roll that one out). There was a gap of 9 months from Apollo 13 to Apollo 14, but the gap between the footage from Apollo 11 to Apollo 14 (they wrecked the camera on Apollo 12, remember) was about 18 months.

Apollo 14 was also the first mission where they played golf on the Moon! Instead of showing evidence of a 1/6th gravity environment, they decided to hit a golf ball that you couldn't even see! Big Grin
i am guessing that you can still find info on the wayback machine

but maybe eventually that stuff will be purged too
(08-05-2018 10:03 PM)pug-thug Wrote: [ -> ]^ is the translation incorrect?

to me he if the translation is correct he clearly talks about kubrick staging parts of it

what is your take on the moon landing?

I have no idea if the translation is correct or not, but the video of his supposed admission is edited. To me, that puts doubt in that video.
Ok yeah. I will look into it more.

What I find interesting is that the Russian govt. talked about FUNDING a project to verify the moon landing

the current russian govt has DOUBTS about the landing.
(08-08-2018 12:54 PM)MrOctober77 Wrote: [ -> ]
(08-05-2018 10:03 PM)pug-thug Wrote: [ -> ]^ is the translation incorrect?

to me he if the translation is correct he clearly talks about kubrick staging parts of it

what is your take on the moon landing?

I have no idea if the translation is correct or not, but the video of his supposed admission is edited. To me, that puts doubt in that video.

Sure, have doubts about the video. But do you have doubts about the Apollo Program itself, or not?
imo believing in apollo in 2018 is like believing santa claus climbs down your chimney on dec. 24th dropping off presents
(08-08-2018 01:47 PM)Chaos Reigns Wrote: [ -> ]
(08-08-2018 12:54 PM)MrOctober77 Wrote: [ -> ]
(08-05-2018 10:03 PM)pug-thug Wrote: [ -> ]^ is the translation incorrect?

to me he if the translation is correct he clearly talks about kubrick staging parts of it

what is your take on the moon landing?

I have no idea if the translation is correct or not, but the video of his supposed admission is edited. To me, that puts doubt in that video.

Sure, have doubts about the video. But do you have doubts about the Apollo Program itself, or not?

No, people so want to believe it was fake. But like just about every other conspiracy, the points have been debunked. The Moon landing truthers just do not want to accept it.
Reference URL's