Evil Academy

Full Version: July 21, 1969: Man walks on the Moon for the 1st time?
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47
what you post is interesting however i am not really seeing the connection between James bond's movie and Kubrick. It's common for directors to meet each other
(08-23-2018 11:38 AM)pug-thug Wrote: [ -> ]what you post is interesting however i am not really seeing the connection between James bond's movie and Kubrick. It's common for directors to meet each other

It is not just 'meeting each other'. It is discussing 'something' with each other long into the night, in the ~April 1971 time frame. So it is not conjecture that Joseph Mankiewicz and Stanley Kubrick KNEW each other. It is also not conjecture that they had an in-depth discussion about 'something' around April 1971.

it is also not conjecture that at exactly this time Joseph Mankiewicz's son, Tom Mankiewicz was working on the screenplay for Diamonds are Forever, which includes a scene where James Bond breaks into a facility owned by 'Willard Whyte' (which everyone acknowledges is based on Howard Hughes) and discovers that they are filming a scene of men on the Moon (in the Nevada desert, no less)! Immediately prior to this scene, James Bond is asking to check the employee's "radiation shields".

Maybe Kubrick needed technical assistance on some aspect, but more likely he just needed to get something off his chest, and there weren't exactly many people he could talk to, or many people he felt he could disclose the information to (the implication being him and Joe had already discussed it previously, probably in the late 60s, i.e. ~4 years earlier).

Sorry if I was not making certain aspects crystal clear. I always want to let the facts speak for themselves, and let people know where I am filling in the gaps with my own conclusions (so-called 'connecting the dots').
I agree his reclusive behavior after the apollo projects ended was strange

but to me the best evidence are all the APOLLO references he makes in subsequent movies

the launch date of Eyes wide shut

and most importantly the admission of the first cosmonaut to do a spacewalk

i like to stick with stuff like this as it's more convincing

but It's nice to know what you just told us about.. as it provides CONFLUENCE
(08-23-2018 12:24 PM)pug-thug Wrote: [ -> ]I agree his reclusive behavior after the apollo projects ended was strange

but to me the best evidence is all the APOLLO references he makes in subsequent movies

the launch date of Eyes wide shut

and most importantly the admission of the first cosmonaut to do a spacewalk

i like to stick with stuff like this as it's more convincing

but It's nice to know what you just told us about.. as it provides CONFLUENCE

I am just trying to build the case brick by brick. Believe me, there is more, such as the date of Kubrick's murder, I mean death, and the release date of Eyes Wide Shut.
yeah I get it. you're just taking it slow providing the appetizer before the main course

Kubrick doing at least some of the PR pics and vids would make sense since he did 2001 so brilliantly

his expertise , esp. artistic expertise would have been needed back then for maximum effect
There's the whole Masonic connection that is interesting in itself.

We had Nazis and the Masons and Crowley Sex Magick worshippers, all working together on the Moon Missions.
(08-23-2018 09:38 PM)Redneck Wrote: [ -> ]There's the whole Masonic connection that is interesting in itself.

We had Nazis and the Masons and Crowley Sex Magick worshippers, all working together on the Moon Missions.

Do you want to cover that aspect, Redneck?
almost all of the apollo astronauts were high level masons 32nd degree at least

2ndly, Apollo 13 was full of numerical references
(08-24-2018 01:59 AM)Chaos Reigns Wrote: [ -> ]
(08-23-2018 09:38 PM)Redneck Wrote: [ -> ]There's the whole Masonic connection that is interesting in itself.

We had Nazis and the Masons and Crowley Sex Magick worshippers, all working together on the Moon Missions.

Do you want to cover that aspect, Redneck?

I will give a brief over view of it when I get some time.

But the gist is that NASA was a collaboration of the Freemasons, escaped Nazis and one OTO member, Jack Parsons the rocket scientist and Initiated sorcerer. There is a deep occult side in the foundation of NASA.
(08-24-2018 07:07 PM)Redneck Wrote: [ -> ]
(08-24-2018 01:59 AM)Chaos Reigns Wrote: [ -> ]
(08-23-2018 09:38 PM)Redneck Wrote: [ -> ]There's the whole Masonic connection that is interesting in itself.

We had Nazis and the Masons and Crowley Sex Magick worshippers, all working together on the Moon Missions.

Do you want to cover that aspect, Redneck?

I will give a brief over view of it when I get some time.

But the gist is that NASA was a collaboration of the Freemasons, escaped Nazis and one OTO member, Jack Parsons the rocket scientist and Initiated sorcerer. There is a deep occult side in the foundation of NASA.

And Freemasonry is just Kabbalah rebranded for Anglos (if trying to put it in as few words as possible)?


" we lie better than any country on earth and i'm proud of that" - jerrod

lmfao @ this nwo shit
is this joe trying to regain some "conspiracy cred"

interesting timing to re-explore this topic

also shows this isn't really a core topic compared to say some of the questionable mass shootings
Quote:shaun smith
3 days ago (edited)
Ask yourself one question... could an operation like a fake moon landing be kept a secret all these years? From the astronauts to the camera, audio and lighting operators, everyone at NASA and the white house staff... Please, Bill Clinton couldn't keep a blowjob a secret for a couple weeks and there were only 2 people in that room.

lol @ this junior level argument.

the manhattan project was kept secret for 10-15 years at least with 10s of thousands of people working on it

also even if info materializes, if the MSM doesn't cover it , it didn't happen for the vast majority of the dupes
(08-29-2018 04:42 PM)pug-thug Wrote: [ -> ]
Quote:shaun smith
3 days ago (edited)
Ask yourself one question... could an operation like a fake moon landing be kept a secret all these years? From the astronauts to the camera, audio and lighting operators, everyone at NASA and the white house staff... Please, Bill Clinton couldn't keep a blowjob a secret for a couple weeks and there were only 2 people in that room.

lol @ this junior level argument.

the manhattan project was kept secret for 10-15 years at least with 10s of thousands of people working on it

also even if info materializes, if the MSM doesn't cover it , it didn't happen for the vast majority of the dupes

They don't know the slightest bit about compartmentalization or cover stories. Why does the lighting guy have to know his job is faking the Moon landing? He is just told to set up the lights, and they are filming a 'simulation', and if he really has to know they can tell him it is "in case something goes wrong with the mission and we lose some of the transmission". Etc etc etc. You tell everyone the absolute minimum.

The rest, probably 100-200 have to know what is going on. They are sworn to secrecy, and a few people are killed off, so everyone knows what is at stake. And that means this is a good time to explore that. How many people surrounding the Apollo Program died, and how many of those deaths were suspicious, or at a critical time?

Like with JFK, the reason there hasn't been another assassination of a President since then is because it hasn't been necessary. You simply show them the JFK tape and say "You get the point?" I.E. after one person is killed, a dozen can be intimidated.

And we already covered the death of Gus Grissom and the Apollo 1 crew in detail, so that will be 1st on the list.

1. Gus Grissom, Edward White, and Roger Chaffee (crew of AS-204, later designated 'Apollo 1')
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47
Reference URL's