Evil Academy

Full Version: Seattle Police Begin Gun Confiscations: No Laws Broken, No Warrant, No Charges
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
From William Cooper's - A pale horse Written in 1991

[Image: 4jsUPy4.jpg]


Now read this article from zerohedge below

A man in Seattle has had his gun confiscated by police after breaking no laws. The police took his gun without a warrant and without pressing any charges. Tyranny has officially taken hold on American soil.

This sets a precedent that government can now forcefully take guns away from an individual without a crime being committed or an arrest being made and without a warrant. In the name of fear and political exploitation of anti-gun rhetoric, a citizen’s Second Amendment rights have been ripped away from him by the government.

The new “red flag” law, which has taken hold in other states already, allows the courts and law enforcement to take away guns from individuals they deem are dangerous and they’ve just begun the confiscation. A man living in the Belltown neighborhood of Seattle, Washington became the first individual in the state to have his firearm confiscated without any formal arrest or charges. The man was not identified by authorities.

Neighbors complained that the man had been “staring” at people through storefront windows while wearing a holstered firearm. He was not brandishing his weapon by any account, and open carrying is legal in the area, so he was abiding by the law. Other residents also complained that the man’s open carrying made them feel “uncomfortable” and “unsafe.”

“He was roaming the hallways with a .25 caliber automatic,” said Tony Montana, a man who lives in the same apartment complex as the gun owner and a person without any reasonable gun knowledge. Handguns are semi-automatic.

These lousy complaints from neighbors allowed police to use the newly passed state law to confiscate the man’s firearm because the man apparently stared at others. Maybe there’s a ban on staring at others in Washington we are unaware of. Under the extreme risk protection orders — also referred to as “erpos” or “red flag laws” — police (government officials) are now allowed to violate a person’s Second and Fourth Amendment rights (which are basic fundamental human rights) and take their legally acquired personal property if they are tattled on by offended liberals.

Source: https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-03-0...no-charges
this is a marathon - not a sprint. They are not aiming at the present day adults, the adults are just the ones who will argue back and forth right now. The goal is to control the minds and emotions of the children right now..... because they will soon be the adults that will allow the complete banning of guns and other freedoms - which will therefore turn into the complete control of the next generation after them. A marathon.....not a sprint. Remember this
So is the name of this supposed neighbour a coincidence or am i just imagening the relation to firearms and maffia boss Tony Montana? It fits te story to good to be a coincidence.. So what is this article then and why is it put up there?

Quote:said Tony Montana, a man who lives in the same apartment complex as the gun owner

[Image: quotes-from-tony-montana.jpg]

So is the name of this supposed neighbour a coincidence or am i just imagening the relation to firearms and maffia boss Tony Montana? It fits te story to good to be a coincidence.. It smells..
Extreme Risk Protection Orders (ERPOs) and Suicide

https://everytownresearch.org/erpo/

This is just a tool to disarm the population. Just like the "fakenews/disinfo" laws in Europe to silence the critics..

I feel we are nearing the End Game or maybe we are allready in play.. Europe, the US, Canada wil strike somesort of alliance anyday now. They've tried it with TTIP and failed more or less but they will succeed.

It's a marathon.. don't forget
notice how it says the govt ENCOURAGES PEOPLE to like GUNS to foster a sense of insecurity. that is why they will never take away the guns
Americans don't have to be disarmed because we don't have the balls to use arms against agents of the state.
Ammon Bundy got away with it.
(03-08-2018 12:33 PM)Count Iblis Wrote: [ -> ]Americans don't have to be disarmed because we don't have the balls to use arms against agents of the state.

ars and aks are peashooters compared to what the US govt has

but on the other hand that Dorner dude was one dude that caused thousands of officers to scramble just to catch him.. so the citizenry having guns can still pose problems for the powers that be.

however I think with no guns, people will have less fear and the cops have less justification to act harshly to people. in most countries around the world the cops would not shoot you over something like reaching out to your glovebox or putting your hand in your coat jacket. in the US they will. the fact that people have guns gives cops the justification to be trigger happy
.
So you suggest making guns illegal even for law abiding citizens?

Who will defend private citizens? The Supreme Court already ruled that cops aren't obligated to protect citizens. Cops only protect each other.

Drugs are illegal also. Are those laws working very well to get rid of drugs?

Do you think more gun laws will get rid of all guns?
Reference URL's