Evil Academy

Full Version: "Venezuela is down to its last $10 billion"
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4
(03-03-2017 01:25 PM)Rako Wrote: [ -> ]You think the Saudis are economic 'geniuses', CTSar?



(03-04-2017 05:29 PM)BRIC Countries Wrote: [ -> ]Saudi Arabia's population is just under 30 million and has a fairly high standard of living. Its biggest problem stems from its religious fanaticism and parasitic ruling class.

you keep talking up Saudi Arabia as if they were is a developed country, they arent. are you taking Their GDP per capita numbers , which arent that great to begin with, at face value? Theyre numbers are similar to Sicily and Greece after almost a decade of recession.
I was under the impression that living conditions in Saudi Arabia were pretty good.

Perks:
-- No Street Shitters
-- Air Conditioned Malls
-- Low Gas Prices
-- No Female Drivers
-- Lots of Luxury Automobiles
It's more like Vegas meets the slums of Manilla.



(01-24-2018 05:16 AM)CTsar Wrote: [ -> ]
(01-22-2018 09:05 PM)Megatherium Wrote: [ -> ]It looks like Venezuela is getting a little too much democracy for it's own good in the EU's opinion Smile

Maduro suspended the congress after Venezuelans elected 2/3rds of it with opposition candidates. Maduro, Morales Chavez are Fidel Castro wannabe morons.

Big Hugo Chavez fan here.

Chavez fucking rules.

RIP


*edit this surprises me. I would have thought those with very little could easily remember when they had even less. It wasn't all that long ago. Sucks for the middle class of course.
(01-24-2018 05:06 AM)kungfool Wrote: [ -> ]
(03-05-2017 08:18 AM)BRIC Countries Wrote: [ -> ]Most 'Mestizo' nations aren't old enough to have experienced a period of sustained stability that didn't involve U.S. or Western European meddling in some form in their internal affairs and/or their parasitic upper class monopolising their industries, resources, and wealth.

Isn't the upper-class of most Latino countries just the non-mixed people?

Yeah, it was painfully obvious this whole thing is race based in Venezuela from the outset. The very first time I saw a report from Venezuela on the anti Chavez middle class protest it jumped right out at me that the faces in the crowd were all white. The trouble for them is that aren't enough of them. The mestizos outnumber them.
The mestizo voting patterns lag whites by just a few years. They will vote for left wing populism and freeload until the money runs out. then shift to the right. Brazil reelected a commie guerrilla president in 2014. they entered recession and now a right wing facist is leading the polls. In Argentina, Kirchner was replaced by a neoliberal . Maduro is basically a dictator now, so he isnt going away until someone kills him.
(01-24-2018 04:03 PM)Megatherium Wrote: [ -> ]Isn't the upper-class of most Latino countries just the non-mixed people?
Yeah, it was painfully obvious this whole thing is race based in Venezuela from the outset.
[/quote]

The soft-Communist 'Land Reform' stuff we used to always hear about makes a little more sense under a Racial lens.
Creo que son un montón de faygots???!!!!
In Latin America, the elites are greedy parasites, and the darker skinned people are incompetent and corrupt.

There is no way to bridge this divide, essentially. Take away the upper crust, and the lower classes will self-destruct, essentially.



Don't tell me how valuable criollos are because they're "white" (when you look at DNA tests, they are quite mixed).

There are 100s of millions of "whites" in Latin America, and they have produced almost NO scientific innovation, nobel prizes, prominent artists / thinkers / philosophers / authors. Every single major genre of Latin American music was invented by black.

This is a civilization based on rape and exploitation of human labor, and nothing good will ever come of it.


...
(01-24-2018 04:00 PM)Megatherium Wrote: [ -> ]*edit this surprises me. I would have thought those with very little could easily remember when they had even less. It wasn't all that long ago. Sucks for the middle class of course.

It's definitely an all time low right now. Venezuela was 4th GDP per capita in the world in 1950 I think. According to wikipedia:

Quote:During Pérez Jimenez' dictatorship from 1952 to 1958, Venezuela enjoyed remarkably high GDP growth, so that in the late 1950s Venezuela's real GDP per capita almost reached that of West Germany. In 1950, Venezuela was the world's 4th largest wealthiest nation per capita[35] However, from 1958/1959 onward, Romulo Betancourt (president from 1959 to 1964) inherited an enormous internal and external debt caused by rampant public spending during the dictatorship. Nevertheless, he managed to balance Venezuela's public budget and initiate an unsuccessful agrarian reform.[36]

1960s–1990s
Buoyed by a strong oil sector in the 1960s and 1970s, Venezuela's governments were able to maintain social harmony by spending fairly large amounts on public programs including health care, education, transport, and food subsidies.

Public spending : disgenics? their mestizo population must've quadrupled since the 50s.
(01-25-2018 05:30 PM)CTsar Wrote: [ -> ]
(01-24-2018 04:00 PM)Megatherium Wrote: [ -> ]*edit this surprises me. I would have thought those with very little could easily remember when they had even less. It wasn't all that long ago. Sucks for the middle class of course.

It's definitely an all time low right now. Venezuela was 4th GDP per capita in the world in 1950 I think. According to wikipedia:

Quote:During Pérez Jimenez' dictatorship from 1952 to 1958, Venezuela enjoyed remarkably high GDP growth, so that in the late 1950s Venezuela's real GDP per capita almost reached that of West Germany. In 1950, Venezuela was the world's 4th largest wealthiest nation per capita[35] However, from 1958/1959 onward, Romulo Betancourt (president from 1959 to 1964) inherited an enormous internal and external debt caused by rampant public spending during the dictatorship. Nevertheless, he managed to balance Venezuela's public budget and initiate an unsuccessful agrarian reform.[36]

1960s–1990s
Buoyed by a strong oil sector in the 1960s and 1970s, Venezuela's governments were able to maintain social harmony by spending fairly large amounts on public programs including health care, education, transport, and food subsidies.

Public spending : disgenics? their mestizo population must've quadrupled since the 50s.

I was always aware that Venezuela had an unusually large white minority but I was surprised to read it was 40 percent. A very large and powerful minority used to holding power so the violence of this conflict should not come as a shock. Still forty percent is forty percent and the democratic system will never work in their favor. Frustrating for them but the mestizos 45 percent has them beat every time, and the blacks and Indio vote goes where they go. Democracy is the bane of the traditional blanco ruling classes in these republics.
(01-25-2018 07:32 PM)Megatherium Wrote: [ -> ]
(01-25-2018 05:30 PM)CTsar Wrote: [ -> ]
(01-24-2018 04:00 PM)Megatherium Wrote: [ -> ]*edit this surprises me. I would have thought those with very little could easily remember when they had even less. It wasn't all that long ago. Sucks for the middle class of course.

It's definitely an all time low right now. Venezuela was 4th GDP per capita in the world in 1950 I think. According to wikipedia:

Quote:During Pérez Jimenez' dictatorship from 1952 to 1958, Venezuela enjoyed remarkably high GDP growth, so that in the late 1950s Venezuela's real GDP per capita almost reached that of West Germany. In 1950, Venezuela was the world's 4th largest wealthiest nation per capita[35] However, from 1958/1959 onward, Romulo Betancourt (president from 1959 to 1964) inherited an enormous internal and external debt caused by rampant public spending during the dictatorship. Nevertheless, he managed to balance Venezuela's public budget and initiate an unsuccessful agrarian reform.[36]

1960s–1990s
Buoyed by a strong oil sector in the 1960s and 1970s, Venezuela's governments were able to maintain social harmony by spending fairly large amounts on public programs including health care, education, transport, and food subsidies.

Public spending : disgenics? their mestizo population must've quadrupled since the 50s.

I was always aware that Venezuela had an unusually large white minority but I was surprised to read it was 40 percent. A very large and powerful minority used to holding power so the violence of this conflict should not come as a shock. Still forty percent is forty percent and the democratic system will never work in their favor. Frustrating for them but the mestizos 45 percent has them beat every time, and the blacks and Indio vote goes where they go. Democracy is the bane of the traditional blanco ruling classes in these republics.

where is that "40 percent" coming from?

According to DNA tests, Argentinian "whites" are roughly 25% indio. I only trust hard DNA evidence for ancestry, Latins have long had an overly fluid notion of race.

Y'all should have stuck with the one drop rule. Just think for a second. Can you imagine? What if Alabama whites were 25% negroid on average -- they would be even more fucked up than they are today.



...
(01-25-2018 08:22 PM)Ghost of Hellfire Awaits Wrote: [ -> ]
(01-25-2018 07:32 PM)Megatherium Wrote: [ -> ]
(01-25-2018 05:30 PM)CTsar Wrote: [ -> ]
(01-24-2018 04:00 PM)Megatherium Wrote: [ -> ]*edit this surprises me. I would have thought those with very little could easily remember when they had even less. It wasn't all that long ago. Sucks for the middle class of course.

It's definitely an all time low right now. Venezuela was 4th GDP per capita in the world in 1950 I think. According to wikipedia:

Quote:During Pérez Jimenez' dictatorship from 1952 to 1958, Venezuela enjoyed remarkably high GDP growth, so that in the late 1950s Venezuela's real GDP per capita almost reached that of West Germany. In 1950, Venezuela was the world's 4th largest wealthiest nation per capita[35] However, from 1958/1959 onward, Romulo Betancourt (president from 1959 to 1964) inherited an enormous internal and external debt caused by rampant public spending during the dictatorship. Nevertheless, he managed to balance Venezuela's public budget and initiate an unsuccessful agrarian reform.[36]

1960s–1990s
Buoyed by a strong oil sector in the 1960s and 1970s, Venezuela's governments were able to maintain social harmony by spending fairly large amounts on public programs including health care, education, transport, and food subsidies.

Public spending : disgenics? their mestizo population must've quadrupled since the 50s.

I was always aware that Venezuela had an unusually large white minority but I was surprised to read it was 40 percent. A very large and powerful minority used to holding power so the violence of this conflict should not come as a shock. Still forty percent is forty percent and the democratic system will never work in their favor. Frustrating for them but the mestizos 45 percent has them beat every time, and the blacks and Indio vote goes where they go. Democracy is the bane of the traditional blanco ruling classes in these republics.

where is that "40 percent" coming from?

According to DNA tests, Argentinian "whites" are roughly 25% indio. I only trust hard DNA evidence for ancestry, Latins have long had an overly fluid notion of race.

Y'all should have stuck with the one drop rule. Just think for a second. Can you imagine? What if Alabama whites were 25% negroid on average -- they would be even more fucked up than they are today.



...

I'm not referring to racial purity obviously. Blanco doesn't mean off the boat from Sweden down there. It's upper and middle class whites and near whites and I guess some middle class mestizos.

But yeah, the 40 percent is a high number for blancos in Latin America and I think it helps explain the degree of frustration and violence we're seeing down there.
I'm not some sort of race fanatic (LOL okay, I am, whatever), but race is so crucial to political stability in Latin America, and that's why it must be discussed openly.

Populism was supposed to represent the voice of the unheard brown masses, a rising tide of freedom against the oppression of the criollo, the landowner, and the greedy white capitalist.

Yeah. OK. That's in theory. In reality, what do we see? A bunch of stupid, corrupt ass beaners who are working overtime to prove that racial stereotypes are true.

[Image: QTsZNKA.jpg]
Maduro: If we make it illegal to earn a profit, then poverty will disappear!


This is what you get when you create a civilization based on rape, exploitation, and extreme social stratification. I'm not going to say "they had it coming", but yeah. The Iberian man's thirst for brown and black pussy was the ultimate obstacle to civilization in the Americas.

Again, can you imagine if white Southerners started accepting quadroons and octoroons as "their own"? All of Dixie would be a Haiti style shithole.


...
(01-25-2018 04:07 PM)Ghost of Hellfire Awaits Wrote: [ -> ]In Latin America, the elites are greedy parasites, and the darker skinned people are incompetent and corrupt.

There is no way to bridge this divide, essentially. Take away the upper crust, and the lower classes will self-destruct, essentially.



Don't tell me how valuable criollos are because they're "white" (when you look at DNA tests, they are quite mixed).

There are 100s of millions of "whites" in Latin America, and they have produced almost NO scientific innovation, nobel prizes, prominent artists / thinkers / philosophers / authors. Every single major genre of Latin American music was invented by black.

This is a civilization based on rape and exploitation of human labor, and nothing good will ever come of it.


...

I think you're forgetting the bossa nova my friend.




Never forget the bossa nova...




Pages: 1 2 3 4
Reference URL's