Evil Academy

Full Version: The Frontier
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3
From "Interstate 60", great film I highly recommend if you haven't seen it.




https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frontier_Thesis Wrote:The Frontier Thesis or Turner Thesis, is the argument advanced by historian Frederick Jackson Turner in 1893 that American democracy was formed by the American frontier. He stressed the process—the moving frontier line—and the impact it had on pioneers going through the process. He also stressed results; especially that American democracy was the primary result, along with egalitarianism, a lack of interest in high culture, and violence. "American democracy was born of no theorist's dream; it was not carried in the Susan Constant to Virginia, nor in the Mayflower to Plymouth. It came out of the American forest, and it gained new strength each time it touched a new frontier," said Turner. In the thesis, the American frontier established liberty by releasing Americans from European mindsets and eroding old, dysfunctional customs. The frontier had no need for standing armies, established churches, aristocrats or nobles, nor for landed gentry who controlled most of the land and charged heavy rents. Frontier land was free for the taking. Turner first announced his thesis in a paper entitled "The Significance of the Frontier in American History", delivered to the American Historical Association in 1893 in Chicago. He won wide acclaim among historians and intellectuals. Turner elaborated on the theme in his advanced history lectures and in a series of essays published over the next 25 years, published along with his initial paper as The Frontier in American History.

Turner's emphasis on the importance of the frontier in shaping American character influenced the interpretation found in thousands of scholarly histories. By the time Turner died in 1932, 60% of the leading history departments in the U.S. were teaching courses in frontier history along Turnerian lines.

My questions are as follows. What is the end game of the cryptocracy? Why are things escalating? Is it because we've run out of frontier on Earth? Has technology basically rendered the "bungled and the botched" (as Nietzsche called the common man) obsolete?
That movie on netflix streaming by any chance?
Isn't Western Europe the new frontier though?


(01-30-2016 01:01 PM)Coffee Guy Wrote: [ -> ]That movie on netflix streaming by any chance?
No, but the full movie is on YouTube.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1YHZNMu7Rzc
(01-30-2016 02:09 PM)Megatherium Wrote: [ -> ]Isn't Western Europe the new frontier though?
Only for Muslims who couldn't cut it as Syrian invaders.
(01-30-2016 02:25 PM)jho Wrote: [ -> ]
(01-30-2016 02:09 PM)Megatherium Wrote: [ -> ]Isn't Western Europe the new frontier though?
Only for Muslims who couldn't cut it as Syrian invaders.

TRUTH
(01-30-2016 12:45 PM)jho Wrote: [ -> ]From "Interstate 60", great film I highly recommend if you haven't seen it.




https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frontier_Thesis Wrote:The Frontier Thesis or Turner Thesis, is the argument advanced by historian Frederick Jackson Turner in 1893 that American democracy was formed by the American frontier. He stressed the process—the moving frontier line—and the impact it had on pioneers going through the process. He also stressed results; especially that American democracy was the primary result, along with egalitarianism, a lack of interest in high culture, and violence. "American democracy was born of no theorist's dream; it was not carried in the Susan Constant to Virginia, nor in the Mayflower to Plymouth. It came out of the American forest, and it gained new strength each time it touched a new frontier," said Turner. In the thesis, the American frontier established liberty by releasing Americans from European mindsets and eroding old, dysfunctional customs. The frontier had no need for standing armies, established churches, aristocrats or nobles, nor for landed gentry who controlled most of the land and charged heavy rents. Frontier land was free for the taking. Turner first announced his thesis in a paper entitled "The Significance of the Frontier in American History", delivered to the American Historical Association in 1893 in Chicago. He won wide acclaim among historians and intellectuals. Turner elaborated on the theme in his advanced history lectures and in a series of essays published over the next 25 years, published along with his initial paper as The Frontier in American History.

Turner's emphasis on the importance of the frontier in shaping American character influenced the interpretation found in thousands of scholarly histories. By the time Turner died in 1932, 60% of the leading history departments in the U.S. were teaching courses in frontier history along Turnerian lines.

My questions are as follows. What is the end game of the cryptocracy? Why are things escalating? Is it because we've run out of frontier on Earth? Has technology basically rendered the "bungled and the botched" (as Nietzsche called the common man) obsolete?

Their endgame is total control of resources and manpower. They want total control of the individual from birth to death.

This is why they are breaking down the family unit. As Julian Huxley put it, they don't want parents passing on outdated morals. His brother Aldous wrote a fictionalized version of what such a world would look like (although he don't mention the "wild" elite ruling from the top). Their family friend Lord Bertrand Russell wrote a book the same year covering the logistics of engineering such a society.

Things are escalating because it's just what they do, they engineer conflict. They fund radicals all over the world, and when radicals take power and buck the system, they fund even more radicals to weaken the first. They also profit massively on war and chaos.

The average person is being made to be obsolete by powers that seek to drive them down. Education is based on creating useful cogs in the wheel of society rather than building on each persons individual talents. They are flooded with toxins from birth, particularly food and vaccines.

The powers that be have 2 choices, they can lift humanity up or they can stifle it. It is clear which direction they prefer.
good post GMB
(01-30-2016 04:19 PM)GMB13 Wrote: [ -> ]Their endgame is total control of resources and manpower. They want total control of the individual from birth to death.

This is why they are breaking down the family unit. As Julian Huxley put it, they don't want parents passing on outdated morals. His brother Aldous wrote a fictionalized version of what such a world would look like (although he don't mention the "wild" elite ruling from the top). Their family friend Lord Bertrand Russell wrote a book the same year covering the logistics of engineering such a society.
I agree, the social engineers are destroying the family with trangenderism, transhumanism, etc. They trying to remove all vestiges of our humanity.

Elon Musk: 'We are summoning the demon' with artificial intelligence

Isn't it interesting that Elon Musk would say that? Like they are manifesting the archons which the ancient Gnostics warned us about. AI is pretty much how the gnostics described them, like robotic beings.



the guys that are making the dystopian technology are always the first to warn

it's a type of predictive programming.

also in occult circles if you telegraph your move you are absolved of guilt
people think Brave new world is a ct book. what a joke. it's not

they make you read that in high school.

it's predictive programming to show you the inevitable end goal.

the west is working with highly sophisticated cognitive models

a real counter NWO book or movie would actually show you the POSSIBILTIES of a great future world.. making you think that is possible. instead hollywood films are all about dystopian futures. pathetic. even more pathetic is that people think these are warnings. they are not.
(01-30-2016 05:05 PM)EVILYOSHIDA Wrote: [ -> ]a real counter NWO book or movie would actually show you the POSSIBILTIES of a great future world.. making you think that is possible. instead hollywood films are all about dystopian futures. pathetic. even more pathetic is that people think these are warnings. they are not.
You're right. The only examples of an optimistic future I can think of are Plato's Republic and a couple Robert Heinlein novels.
What's interesting to note Bob Gale, the screenwriter & director of Interstate 60, also wrote the screenplays for the Back to the Future movies which offer alternating utopian and distopian futures. As director of "Interstate 60" (a movie which explores a world of possibilities and the importance of truth) Bob Gale seems almost the antithesis of Back to the Future director Robert Zemeckis who puts a ton of 9/11 predictive programming into his films.





I don't want to spoil the movie Interstate 60, but in the film Bob Gales alludes to Plato's Allegory of the Cave and Carl Jung's Synchronicity.
^ we have a huge thread on that topic.
Pages: 1 2 3
Reference URL's