Evil Academy

Full Version: CNN's Ashleigh Banfield dares to talk about Jewish terrorism in America on air
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Who does she think she is, holding the chosen people to the same standard as others? Chutzpah, I tell you.

CNN anchor: Jews carried out terror attacks, should they be barred from entering US?

http://www.jpost.com/Diaspora/In-reporte...-US-436775

In reported cases of Jewish terror attacks, should all Jews be barred from obtaining visas in order to enter the United States?

This was a question posed by CNN's Ashleigh Banfield Tuesday morning during an interview with former Ronald Reagan White House administration official and current Donald Trump supporter, Jeffrey Lord, when asked if his preferred presidential candidate was not applying a double standard to Muslims.





"If you supplant the word ‘Jews’ for ‘Muslims’ in a lot of the rhetoric that we’ve had this morning, I think people would find it sort of cringe-worthy and reminiscent of a really ugly time in our history," Banfield said. "There have been Jewish terrorist attacks. Should we therefore ask no Jews to please apply for a visa?"

The CNN anchor then provided specifics examples: "From a period of 1980 to 1985 there were a reported 18 terror attacks committed in the United States by Jews, 15 of them committed by the Jewish Defense League," Banfield said. 'The head of the Jewish Defense league was in jail awaiting trial...accused of trying to bomb a mosque in Culver City, trying to bomb [US Congressman] Darrel Issa's office, an Arab-American."


"Are you really saying to me that there’s an international Jewish conspiracy to take over the world?" Lord asked in response.

"There are no Jews coming to [the US] to destroy America," Lord added.

Earlier this week, Trump called for blocking Muslims, including would-be immigrants, students, tourists and other visitors, from entering the United States following last week's California shooting spree by two Muslims who authorities said were radicalized.

It was the most dramatic response by a presidential candidate following the San Bernardino, California, rampage, even as other Republicans have called for a suspension of President Barack Obama's plan to allow in some refugees from Syria.
Related: Would a President Trump actually have the power to ban Muslim immigration? Is there a precedent for such a move?



Didn't watch the video, but let me guess, he didn't answer the question.
this whole donald trump shit is a psyop

they have so much dirt on him it's not even funny

they know people are angry, they will give you something to release some steam

he won't run and he won't continue. if he does run and win, he'll just be a neocon that repeats populist sentiments without doing shit
the only good thing about this Trump guy is that he's widening psychological parameters in regards to speech. he is doing some good, but I don't trust him at all
(12-18-2015 12:14 AM)johan Wrote: [ -> ]Related: Would a President Trump actually have the power to ban Muslim immigration? Is there a precedent for such a move?




this video basically proves that the US has laws on the books that can prevent entire races from entering the country.

quite the opposite of Liberte, Egalite, Fraternite don't ya think?

just 60 years ago they rounded up Japanese Americans and put them into concentration camps. Ludicrous
how about letting the people decide who they want in, call a referendum proposing a bill that mirrors the 1924 Immigration act restricting non white influx. If approved it revokes and supersedes the 1965 act.
(12-18-2015 01:41 PM)CTsar Wrote: [ -> ]how about letting the people decide who they want in, call a referendum proposing a bill that mirrors the 1924 Immigration act restricting non white influx. If approved it revokes and supersedes the 1965 act.

The polls I have seen throughout 2015 suggest that between 60%-85% of Americans want to seriously restrict or all together freeze immigration. I saw one poll as high as 93%. The numbers are also considerably high in Europe.

Few things display our representatives disregard for the will of the people more than the immigration issue.
(12-18-2015 07:33 AM)EVILYOSHIDA Wrote: [ -> ]this whole donald trump shit is a psyop

they have so much dirt on him it's not even funny

they know people are angry, they will give you something to release some steam

he won't run and he won't continue. if he does run and win, he'll just be a neocon that repeats populist sentiments without doing shit

It's possible what you say. I think, to be sure, they will consider all options to ensure one of their hand-picked patsies is elected.

Moreover, no one can predict how someone would behave whilst in office. Having followed Trump's career a bit, what I can say, with a fair degree of confidence, is that he seems to be his own man, rather than a person willing to take orders from others, and particularly people he considers below himself.

I think he's a wrench in the plans of the American/Globalist shadow rulers, and, at this point, they are probably seriously exploring contingencies in the event that he's elected.
(12-18-2015 09:42 PM)johan Wrote: [ -> ]
(12-18-2015 01:41 PM)CTsar Wrote: [ -> ]how about letting the people decide who they want in, call a referendum proposing a bill that mirrors the 1924 Immigration act restricting non white influx. If approved it revokes and supersedes the 1965 act.

The polls I have seen throughout 2015 suggest that between 60%-85% of Americans want to seriously restrict or all together freeze immigration. I saw one poll as high as 93%. The numbers are also considerably high in Europe.

Few things display our representatives disregard for the will of the people more than the immigration issue.

It's probably a universal. Massive immigration/migration is, effectively, conquest by other means.
Reference URL's